H.L.DATTU, ANIL R.DAVE
BONANZO ENGINEERING & CHEMICAL PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent
ORDER
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short 'the Tribunal') in Appeal No.E/1352/2002-B dated 25.10.2002. By the impugned judgment and order, the Tribunal has sustained the original order passed by the Adjudicating Authority.
2. The undisputed facts are: the appellant is a manufacturer of goods falling under Chapter Headings 32 and 84 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('the Act' for short). The description of the goods under those chapters for the purpose of disposal of this appeal may not be necessary, since we are called upon in this appeal to give a purposive construction to the language employed in the Notification No.175/86-CE dated 1.3.1986 and Notification No.111/88-CE dated 1.3.1988.
3. The Notification No.175/86-CE dated 1.3.1986 exempts the excisable goods of the description specified in the annexure appended to the Notification as enumerated under various Chapters of the Schedule to the Act. The assessee availing the benefit of the exemption notification has to satisfy two specific conditions for claiming exemption from payment of duty u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.