SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 137

H.L.DATTU, ANIL R.DAVE
BONANZO ENGINEERING & CHEMICAL PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent


ORDER

1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (for short 'the Tribunal') in Appeal No.E/1352/2002-B dated 25.10.2002. By the impugned judgment and order, the Tribunal has sustained the original order passed by the Adjudicating Authority.

2. The undisputed facts are: the appellant is a manufacturer of goods falling under Chapter Headings 32 and 84 of the first schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 ('the Act' for short). The description of the goods under those chapters for the purpose of disposal of this appeal may not be necessary, since we are called upon in this appeal to give a purposive construction to the language employed in the Notification No.175/86-CE dated 1.3.1986 and Notification No.111/88-CE dated 1.3.1988.

3. The Notification No.175/86-CE dated 1.3.1986 exempts the excisable goods of the description specified in the annexure appended to the Notification as enumerated under various Chapters of the Schedule to the Act. The assessee availing the benefit of the exemption notification has to satisfy two specific conditions for claiming exemption from payment of duty u





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top