SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 220

H.L.DATTU, CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD
SATISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF HARYANA – Respondent


ORDER

1. Application for impleadment/intervention is rejected.

2. Leave granted.

3. This appeal is filed against the judgment and order dated 16.09.2011 passed in anticipatory bail application by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Miscellaneous No.M- 26433 of 2011. The High Court has rejected the application for anticipatory bail.

4. This Court, on 31.10.2011, while issuing notice, has ordered for release of the appellant on his furnishing the personal bond of Rs.20,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer, subject to the condition that he will join the investigation as and when required and shall abide by the provisions of Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In our opinion, the aforesaid order should be made absolute and is made absolute. Appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top