SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 165

2012 (4) SCC 97
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A. K. PATNAIK & SWATANTER KUMAR, JJ.
SONU SARDAR - Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF CHHATTISGARH - Respondent
Criminal Appeal Nos. 1333-1334 of 2010-
Decided on : 23-02-2012.

IMPORTANT POINT
Murder of helpless persons including children calls for death sentence.

Headnote:(a) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 396 – The oral as well as medical and forensic evidence proving guilt of appellants beyond doubt – No infirmity in conviction. (Para 6)

       (b) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 396 – Conviction – Trial court elaborately discussing the question of sentence – Recorded 8 aggravating circumstances and it could not find any mitigating circumstance – No infirmity in conviction. (Para 7, 8, 9)

       (2004) 2 SCC 338; (2010) 9 SCC 1 – Relied upon

       (2011) 3 SCC 685 – Referred

       (c) Indian Penal Code, 1860 – Section 396 – Sentence – Role of appellant in killing five helpless persons including two children established – Crime pre-meditated – His criminal propensities beyond reform – He is a menace to the society – No infirmity in the death sentence. (Para 11, 12)

       (2010) 10 SCC 611 – Relied upon

       Facts of the case:

       Appellants and three others committed offence u/s 396 IPC. However the three others absconded and the two appellants were convicted and sentenced u/s 396 IPC for dacoity and murder. They were sentenced to death.

       The conviction and sentence were confirmed by the High Court.

       Finding of the Court:

       There is no infirmity in conviction and sentence.

       Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

A. K. Patnaik, J.-These are appeals against the judgment of the High Court of Chhattisgarh in Criminal Reference No.1 of 2008 and Criminal Appeal No. 240 of 2008 confirming the conviction of the appellant and the death penalty imposed on him under Section 396 of the Indian Penal Code (for short `IPC').

2. The prosecution case very briefly is that on 26.11.2004, Shamim Akhtar (for short Shamim'), a scrap dealer and a resident of village Cher, Distt. Baikunthpur, Chhattisgarh, had gone to Raipur for selling scrap. He sold the scrap and received cash of Rs.1,70,000/- and returned to his house with the cash. His wife, Ruksana Bibi, kept the cash in different places of her house, which was to be deposited in the bank the next day. At about 6.00 p.m. on 26.11.2004, Sonu Sardar, the appellant herein, and Ajay Singh @ Fotu along with three other persons came with scrap to the shop of Shamim and left after selling scrap for Rs.480/-. The appellant and Ajay Singh and three other persons, however, returned at about 7.00 p.m. on the same day and knocked on the door of the house of Shamim. When the door was opened, the appellant and Ajay Singh and three other persons demanded money from Shamim. One of these five persons then bolted the door from inside and two other persons caught hold of Asgar Ali, driver of Shamim, and one of them caught hold of Shamim. They kept a knife on the neck of Shamim and compelled him to give cash which he was having in his pocket. Shabana Khatun (for short `Shabana'), the daughter of Shamim, who was present inside, tried to fight but an attempt was made by the appellant and his people to assault her and she somehow escaped through the back door and went to the house of Ramlal, a kilometer away from the house of Shamim. Shabana told Ramlal about the incident at her house and when Ramlal wanted to go to their house, Shabana asked him not to go because she was afraid that Sonu Sardar and others may kill him. That night Shabana stayed at the house of Ramlal and next morning at about 4-5 a.m., Shabana, Ramlal and his wife Dhanpatbai came to the house of Shamim and found that Yakut and Asna, 3 years old son and 5 years old daughter of Shamim, were crying near the dead bodies of Shamim, Ruksana Bibi, Yakub and Kumari Rana, 7 years old son and 9 years old daughter of Shamim. Shabana then went to Baikunthpur and narrated the incident to her uncle Nasim Akhtar, who reported the matter the Police. The Police reached the spot and the FIR was lodged. The dead bodies were sent for autopsy to the Community Health Centre, Baikunthpur, and a team led by Dr. Ashok Kumar carried out the post mortem. In course of investigation, the Investigating Officer recorded statements of several persons under Section 161, Cr.P.C. The appellant and his co- accused, Ajay and Chhoti Bai, were arrested but the other persons absconded after commission of crime. Blood-stained T-shirt and turban of the appellant and an axe with broken handle, a rod and a knife were seized. Test Identification Parade was carried out on 01.12.2004 in which Shabana identified the appellant as well as Ajay as two of the five persons who had come to the house of Shamim on 26.11.2004 and were demanding money. The seized articles were sent to the Forensic Science Laboratory, Raipur. After completion of investigation, a chargesheet was filed and Sessions Trial No.06/2006 was conducted by the Sessions Judge, Koriya, Baikunthpur (Chhattisgarh).

3. In course of the trial, the prosecution examined 38 witnesses. Shabana was examined as PW-1, Ramlal was examined as PW-2, Nasim Akhtar was examined as PW-3 and Dhanpatbai was examined as PW-4. Dr. Ashok Kumar was examined as PW-36 and the Investigating Officer was examined as PW-37. A large number of documents and the seized articles were also exhibited. The trial court recorded the statements of the appellant under Section 313, Cr. P.C. After hearing the arguments, the trial court held that it was clear from the evidence


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top