SWATANTER KUMAR, RANJAN GOGOI
Brijesh Mavi – Appellant
Versus
State of NCT of Delhi – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ranjan Gogoi, J
These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order dated 10.08.2009 passed by the High Court of Delhi whereby the conviction of the appellant under Sections 302 and 460 read with Section 34 of the IPC as well as under Section 25 of the Arms Act has been affirmed. The appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC whereas for the offence under Section 460 read with Section 34 IPC sentence of seven years rigorous imprisonment has been imposed. Insofar as the offence under the Arms Act is concerned, the accused-appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. All the sentences have been directed to run concurrently.
2. The short case of the prosecution is that on 06.06.2001, H.C. Brij Pal (PW 11), who was posted in the PCR, received an information at about 10.35 PM that firing is taking place at Savitri Nagar near a sweet shop. Accordingly, PW 11 alongwith other police personnel reached the said place and saw that a crowd had gathered near a STD booth where blood was splattered and some articles were lying scattered in broken condition. T
Aftab Ahmad Anasari v. State of Uttaranchal
Sanatan Naskar v. State of West Bengal
Mohd. Arif alias Ashfaq v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Abdulwahab Abdulmajid Baloch vs. State of Gujarat
Musheer Khan Alias Badshah Khan v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.