SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 458

G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
Ashok Kumar Ratilal Patel – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J.-Leave granted. This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 23rd March, 2011 passed by the Gujarat High Court whereby the High Court dismissed the writ petition and affirmed the order of cancellation of offer of appointment as was issued to the appellant.

2. The appellant who was initially appointed on 25th August, 2000 as Director, Computer Department in the Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University (hereinafter referred to as the ‘North Gujarat University’) in the scale of pay of Rs.12,000-420-18,300, applied for the appointment to the post of Director on deputation pursuant to an advertisement No.Estt.09-(01)2009 dated 13th September, 2009 published in the Newspaper (Times of India) by the 2nd respondent. By the said advertisement the candidates were informed that the pre-revised scale of pay of the post of Director is Rs.14,300-400-18,300 with further intimation that the said scale of pay will be revised to the pay band + Grade Pay of PB-4 Rs.37,000-67,000 + 8,700. Applications were called for from amongst suitable and eligible persons having Master Degree with 12 years’ experience in Teaching or Research in Central or State



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top