Supreme Court of India
K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN & DIPAK MISRA
Satyaprata Sahoo & Others
Versus
State of Orissa & Others
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5705-5706 OF 2012 [Arising out of SLP (Civil) Nos. 1620116202 of 2012]
Decided on : 03-08-2012
(2003) 7 SCC 83; (1992) 2 SCC 26; (1975) 1 SCC 267; (1986) 3 SCC 727 - Relied upon
(b) Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 - Clause 9(1)(a) - Candidates of in-service category cannot encroach upon the open category, so also vice-versa. (Para 27)
(c) Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Section 10A - Admissions to medical colleges cannot be over and above the number of seats granted by MCI - If one category of candidates have encroached upon quota of other categories, Court cannot increase seats to accommodate such candidates. (Para 32)
(1994) 1 SCC 175; (1998) 6 SCC 131; (2005) 2 SCC 65 - Relied upon
(d) Constitution of India,1950 - Article 226 - Impleading the parties - When large number of candidates had filed the writ petition and their admission was subject to outcome of the petition, non-impleadment of few of those candidates in these proceedings would not affect the legitimate claim raised by the appellants.(Para 34)
(e) Postgraduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000 - Clause 9(2)(d) -- Proviso quashed to the extent providing for weightage for in-service candidates in direct category. (Para 36)
Facts of the case:
This case relates to admission to medical colleges in Odisha.
Finding of the Court:
Candidates of in-service category cannot encroach upon the open category, so also vice-versa.
Result : Appeal allowed.
Judgment :-
K.S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appellants, who have appeared in the Entrance Examination for Post-Graduate (Medical) Selection 2012, Odisha are challenging the validity of Clause 11.2 of the Prospectus for selection of candidates for Post-Graduate (Medical) Courses in the Government Medical Colleges of Odisha for the Academic Year, 2012, as violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
3. The appellants appeared in the entrance examination as ‘direct candidates’ (Open Category) and have qualified purely on merit for admission to Post Graduate (Medical) Courses 2012 in the Government Medical Colleges in Odisha. The Prospectus issued for Post-Graduate (Medical) Selection, 2012, Odisha deals with the availability of the seats both in the category of direct as well as in-service. Clause 4 of the Prospectus gives the category-wise details of the seats for P.G. (Medical) Courses in three Government Medical Colleges in Odisha for the Academic Year 2012. For the category MD/MS Course, in-service category, 87 seats are available and for direct category, 86 seats are available, totaling 173 seats. Appellants, who fall under the category of direct candidates, as already indicated, are aggrieved by Clause 11.2 of the Prospectus which stipulates an additional weightage for candidates who are in employment of Government of Odisha/Government of Odisha undertaking / Government of India Public Undertaking located in Odisha and had worked in Rural/Tribal/Backward areas while applying through the category of direct candidates. Additional weightage of 10% of marks secured in the P.G. Entrance Examination per year of completion of service in -Rural/Tribal/Backward areas, subject to the maximum of 30% of marks secured in the entrance examination, in service to be given to those candidates who apply through direct category.
4. Appellants submit that the above clause is wholly arbitrary, discriminatory and goes contrary to the ratio laid down by this Court in State of M.P. & Ors. V. Gopal D. Tirthani & Ors. (2003) 7 SCC 83 and Dr. Snehelata Patnaik & Ors. V. State of Orissa & Ors. (1992) 2 SCC 26. Appellants have also prayed for quashing the Medical Council of India (in short ‘MCI’) Notification No. 51210 of 17.11.2009 providing weightage marks to in-service candidates applying through the direct category, which according to the appellants, is a clear encroachment and appropriation of seats earmarked for the direct category candidates which has to be filled up purely on merit, subject to rule of reservation. Appellants’ challenge was repelled by the learned single Judge of the Orissa High Court as well as the Division Bench. Hence, these appeals.
5. Shri Shyam Diwan, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants submits that providing additional weightage marks to in-service candidates who had rendered service in - Rural/Tribal/Backward areas while considering their applications for admission through the direct candidate category amounts to making an artificial differentiation between a homogenous class i.e. direct candidates and in-service candidates. Learned senior counsel pointed out that on account of additional weightage benefit given to the doctors who have rendered less than five years of service in Rural/Tribal/Backward areas both in Government of Odisha or Public Sector Undertakings owned by the State Government, will be an advantageous position and that would amount to drawing an artificial differentiation between a homogeneous class i.e. direct candidates and in-service candidates and also within the in-service candidates, which action would be hit by Article 14 of the Constitution of India.
6. Learned senior counsel also pointed out that the same further amounts to providing horizontal reservation within the seats meant for in-service candidates. Learned senior counsel pointed out that the admission through direct candidates route be made purely on merit on the basis of the common entrance exam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.