Fazal vs State of U. P. - 2012 Supreme(SC) 286

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2012 Supreme(SC) 286

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD, H.L.DATTU
Fazal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: R.S. Rathi, Kusum and Prabhat Kumar, Advs. for Ashok Kumar Gupta II, Adv.
For Respondents/Defendant: Ratnakar Dash, Sr. Adv. and Vikrant Yadav, Adv. for Kamlendra Mishra, Adv.

ORDER

1. Application for exemption from filing Official Translation is allowed.

2. Leave granted.

3. Delay condoned.

4. As the Appellant has already served a period of more than 5 years of sentence, in our opinion, the Appellant deserves to be released on bail. Accordingly, we direct that, during the pendency of the appeal, the Appellant be released on bail, subject to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2012 Supreme(SC) 286

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD, H.L.DATTUFazal – AppellantVersusState of U. P. – Respondent

CHANDRAMAULI KR.PRASAD, H.L.DATTU
Fazal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent