IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.M. Lodha and H.L. Gokhale, JJ.
Mulchand Khanumal Khatri
Vs.
State of Gujarat and Ors.
Civil Appeal No. 4990 of 2003
Decided On: 27.03.2012
(2007) 5 SCC 23 – Relied upon
Facts of the case:
The Appellant challenged the acquisition of his land in a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court. An interim relief in the above matter was granted on April 18, 1984.
The Act was amended on September 24, 1984 whereby Section 11A was brought in the statute book.
The Special Civil Application filed by the Appellant was dismissed on January 11, 1996. The Dy. Collector made the award on August 31, 1998.
Before the High Court the Appellant took the stand that the award having been passed beyond two years from the date of the publication of the declaration under Section 6, by virtue of Section 11A of the Act, the entire acquisition proceedings had lapsed.
The High Court dismissed the application.
Finding of the Court:
Impugned judgment is not sustainable.
Result: Appeal allowed.
JUDGMENT
R.M. Lodha, J.
1. The judgment and order dated December 26, 2002 passed by the Gujarat High Court is under challenge in this Appeal by special leave.
2. The Appellant claims to be joint owner of the land being Survey No. 11430 admeasuring 34 sq. mtr. at Palanpur, Gujarat. On April 1, 1980, a notification was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, 'the Act') that proposed acquisition of the Appellant's land and some other land for the public purpose, namely, construction of Palanpur City and taluka Police Station. The said notification was published in the Government Gazette on January 8, 1981. Later on, Section 4 notification wag revised and published in the Official Gazette on September 22, 1983. The declaration under Section 6 was published on January 5, 1984. The Appellant challenged the acquisition of his land through the above notifications in a Special Civil Application before the Gujarat High Court. An interim relief in the above matter was granted on April 18, 1984.
3. The Act was amended on September 24, 1984 by the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984 (for short, 'the Amendment Act') whereby Section 11A was brought in the statute book.
4. The Special Civil Application filed by the Appellant was dismissed on January 11, 1996. The Dy. Collector made the award on August 31, 1998.
5. Before the High Court, inter alia, the argument was canvassed on behalf of the Appellant that the award having been passed beyond two years from the date of the publication of the declaration under Section 6, by virtue of Section 11A of the Act, the entire acquisition proceedings had lapsed. The High Court, however, repelled the above argument and held as follows:
The submission of the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner was that their earlier petitions were dismissed and the stay granted earlier stood vacated by the Division Bench of this Court on 11.1.96. Therefore, the Authority was supposed to declare the Award within a period of 2 years from that day i.e. 11.1.96. The said period would expire on January 10, 1998 whereas Award Under Section 11 came to be passed only in August, 1998 which is admittedly after a period of 2 years. It is no doubt true that the Division Bench of this Court earlier dismissed their writ petitions on 11.1.96 and vacated the interim relief, but the vacation of interim relief granted in favour of the Petitioners must be brought to the notice of the concerned Authority. Merely because they were represented through their counsel before the court would not be sufficient. Unless and until certified copy of the said judgment and order passed by the court is brought to the notice of the Authority, the Authority is not supposed to act. The period of 2 years would start only from the date of the notice. In reply affidavit it has been clearly stated that the copy of the judgment and order passed by this Court on 11.1.96 was received by them only 5.9.97.
In that view of the matter, admittedly the Award dt. 31.8.98 passed Under Section 11 of the Act was within a period of 2 years.
6. From the above discussion, it is apparent that the High Court was of the view that unless and until certified copy of the judgment and order passed by the court 'was brought to the notice of the authority, the authority was not supposed to act and the period of two years under Section 11A of the Act would start only from the date of such notice and as the copy of the judgment and order passed by the High Court on January 11, 1996 was received by the competent authority on September 5, 1997, the Respondents were entitled to the benefit of the entire period from January 11, 1996 to September 5, 1997.
7. We are unable to accept the view of the High Court.
8. Section 11A of the Act reads as under:
11A. Period within which an award shall be made.-
(1) The Collector shall make an award under Section 11 within a period of two years from the date of the publication of the declaration and if no award is made within that period,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.