SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 194

ANIL R.DAVE, H.L.DATTU
Commissioner of Customs – Appellant
Versus
Konkan Synthetic Fibres – Respondent


ORDER

1. This Civil Appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'CESTAT'), Mumbai in Appeal No. C/43/02- Mumbai, dated 04.09.2003. By the impugned judgment and order, the CESTAT has granted relief to the Assessee by giving a liberal interpretation to the beneficial Notification No. 17/01-Cus dated 1.3.2001, as amended by Notification No. 44/01-Cus, dated 26.4.2001.

2. The Assessee is an importer. It has imported one unit of equipment which was declared as "Kari Mayer High Speed Draw Warping Machine with 1536 ends along with essential spares". On such importation, it had presented the Bill of Entry No. 207814 dated 25.9.2001 before the Customs authorities, inter alia, seeking clearance of the same by extending the benefit of the Notification No. 17/01-Cus dated 1.3.2001, as amended by Notification No. 44/01-Cus, dated 26.04.2001. The Customs authorities had refused to accept the request of the Assessee and accordingly, had directed the Assessee to pay the duty under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 ("the Act" for short). Therefore, the Assessee was constrained to pay the duty in order to clear the




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top