ANIL R.DAVE, H.L.DATTU
Commissioner of Customs – Appellant
Versus
Konkan Synthetic Fibres – Respondent
ORDER
1. This Civil Appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (for short 'CESTAT'), Mumbai in Appeal No. C/43/02- Mumbai, dated 04.09.2003. By the impugned judgment and order, the CESTAT has granted relief to the Assessee by giving a liberal interpretation to the beneficial Notification No. 17/01-Cus dated 1.3.2001, as amended by Notification No. 44/01-Cus, dated 26.4.2001.
2. The Assessee is an importer. It has imported one unit of equipment which was declared as "Kari Mayer High Speed Draw Warping Machine with 1536 ends along with essential spares". On such importation, it had presented the Bill of Entry No. 207814 dated 25.9.2001 before the Customs authorities, inter alia, seeking clearance of the same by extending the benefit of the Notification No. 17/01-Cus dated 1.3.2001, as amended by Notification No. 44/01-Cus, dated 26.04.2001. The Customs authorities had refused to accept the request of the Assessee and accordingly, had directed the Assessee to pay the duty under the provisions of the Customs Act, 1962 ("the Act" for short). Therefore, the Assessee was constrained to pay the duty in order to clear the
Commissioner of Customs (Preventive), Mumbai v. M. Ambalal and Company
Commissioner of Sales Tax v. Industrial Coal Enterprises
Commissioner of Central Excise, Shillong v. North-Eastern Tobacco Company Ltd.
Associated Cement Companies Ltd. v. State of Bihar
G.P. Ceramics Private Limited v. Commissioner, Trade Tax, Uttar Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.