A.K.PATNAIK, SWATANTER KUMAR
Jitender Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Swatanter Kumar, J.
1. The Trial Court, vide its judgment of conviction dated 5th November, 2003 and order of sentence dated 10th November, 2003, held all the five accused, namely, Sunil Kumar, Satish, Pawan Kumar, Jitender Kumar and Ratti Ram guilty of the offence under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (Indian Penal Code). The Trial Court further held that except Jitender, remaining four accused were also guilty of the offence under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code. The Trial Court acquitted all the four accused for the offence under Section 323 read with Sections 34 and 342 Indian Penal Code and convicted them as follows:
Taking into consideration all the aspects of the case, I take a lenient view and sentence Sunil, Satish, Pawan and Ratti Ram accused to imprisonment for life under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code and Section 120B Indian Penal Code. Each of the accused is sentenced to a fine of Rs. 1000/- under the said sections. In default of payment of fine, the defaulting accused shall suffer further rigorous imprisonment for six months.
Jitender accused has been found guilty under Section 120B Indian Penal Code for conspira
State of U.P. v. Krishna Master
Ranjit Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Aloke Nath Dutta v. State of West Bengal
Anter Singh v. State of Rajasthan
Yakub Ismailbhai Patel v. State of Gujarat
State of Rajasthan v. Shubh Shanti Services Ltd. V. Manjula S. Agarwalla
Shambhoo Missir v. State of Bihar
Shivappa v. State of Karnataka
Rupchand Chindu Kathewar v. State of Maharashtra
Shaikh Sattar v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.