SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(SC) 1237

Supreme Court of India
ASHOK BHAN & S.H. KAPADIA
Chiranjilal (Dead) By Lrs.
Versus
Hari Das (Dead) By Lrs.
C.A.No.3745 of 2002
Decided on: 05-10-2004

Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant:K.N. Bhat, M.K. Verma, Raj Singh Rana, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Japal Singh, Jayshree Wad, Ashish Wad, Yugandhara Jha, Neeraj Kumar, Advocates.

Headnote:

Limitation Act, 1963, Article 136 - Execution of decree- Starting point of limitation - As there was conflict amongst three, two- Judge Bench decisions of the Supreme Court, the matter directed to be placed before Hon'ble Chief Justice for reference to three-Judges Bench. [Paras 1 and 2]

Judgment

1. After hearing the counsel for the parties, we find there is obvious conflict among the three two Judge Bench decisions i.e. (i) Shankar Balwant Lokhande v. Chandrakant Shankar Lokhande (1995 (3) SCC 413), (ii) W.B. Essential Commodities Supply Corpn. v. Swadesh Agro Farming & Storage (P) Ltd. (1999 (8) SCC 315), and (iii) Hameed Joharan v. Abdul Salam (2001 (7) SCC 573). Yet another two Judge Bench decision in Renu Devi v. Mahendra Singh (2003 (10) SCC 200 : AIR 2003 SC 1608) would also have some bearing on the point.

2. In this view of the matter, we deem it appropriate that this case be placed before a three Judge Bench to resolve the conflict in the aforesaid decisions.

3. May be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice for appropriate orders.

Order accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top