Supreme Court of India
TARUN CHATTERJEE & AFTAB ALAM
Vandana Sharma
Versus
Rakesh Kumar Sharma
TRANSFER PETITION (C) NO.921 OF 2006
Decided on: 21-08-2008
Transfer Petition - Matrimonial Proceedings - The court allowed the transfer of a matrimonial proceeding from Delhi to Panchkula (Haryana) considering the difficulties faced by the wife in attending the court in Delhi due to her residence in Panchkula with her minor daughters.
Fact of the Case:
The wife sought transfer of a matrimonial proceeding from Delhi to Panchkula (Haryana) due to difficulties in attending the court in Delhi from Panchkula, where she resided with her minor daughters.
Finding of the Court:
The court allowed the transfer, considering the difficulties faced by the wife in attending the court in Delhi from Panchkula, where she resided with her minor daughters.
Issues: Transfer of matrimonial proceeding from one court to another due to difficulties faced by the wife in attending the court in Delhi from Panchkula.
Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the difficulties faced by the wife in attending the court in Delhi from Panchkula, where she resided with her minor daughters, as a just and proper reason for allowing the transfer of the matrimonial proceeding.
Final Decision: The court allowed the transfer of the matrimonial proceeding from Delhi to Panchkula (Haryana) and directed the timely disposal of the case without unnecessary adjournments.
Judgment
1. By this transfer petition, the wife -Smt.Vandana Sharma seeks transfer of S.M.A. Case No.6 of 2006 (Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs. Smt. Vandana Sharma) pending in the Court of Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi to the Court of District Judge, Panchkula (Haryana), which has been filed at the instance of the husband -Rakesh Kumar Sharma for divorce under Section 27(1)(b)(d) of the Special Marriage Act, 1954.
2. In spite of due service on the respondent to contest the application for transfer, no one has entered appearance on behalf of the husband -opposite party to contest the application for transfer of the aforesaid matrimonial proceeding from Delhi to Punchkula (Haryana).
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and considered the entire materials on record. It is an admitted fact that the wife/petitioner is having two minor daughters staying with her, one of whom is only 7 months' old and that, it would be very difficult for her to attend the Court at Delhi from Punchkula (Haryana), where she is now residing with her two minor daughters in the absence of any male member to accompany her from Punchkula to Delhi, it would be just and proper that the matrimonial proceedings pending in the Tis Hazari Courts at Delhi be transferred to the Court of the District Judge, Punchkula (Haryana) at an early date.
4. Accordingly, we allow this application for transfer and the Additional District Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, before whom the aforesaid case is pending, is directed to transmit the records of the said case at an early date preferably within one month from the date of supply of a copy of this order to him. It is expected that the District Judge, Panchkula (Haryana) or any other appropriate court to be nominated by the District Judge, Panchkula (Hayana) shall dispose of the case within one year from the date of receiving the records of the same without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.
5. The application for transfer is thus allowed. There will be no order as to costs.
Application allowed.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.