SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 Supreme(SC) 1739

CYRIAC JOSEPH, S.B.SINHA
Tamil Nadu Electricity Board – Appellant
Versus
Rasipuram Textile (P) Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment

Leave granted.

1. One Executive Engineer of the Tamil Nadu State Electricity Board made a surprise inspection of the premises of first respondent -Rasipuram Textile Mills. Allegedly, theft of electrical energy was detected.

2. A criminal prosecution was lodged not only against the company but also against its Managing Director and other Directors purported to under Section 39(1) and 44(1)(c) of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

3. Learned trial Judge, recorded a judgment of conviction against the accused. So far as the Directors of the Company are concerned, the learned trial Judge convicted despite noticing the provisions contained in Section 49A of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910, observing:

"From the above, it is clear that, all the persons responsible for the administration of a company are liable for the offence committed by the Company. If anybody disowns the liability and claims it has happened without his knowledge or despite the sincere efforts the offence has been committed, then it is for the concerned accused to prove the same. On this basis, the Managing Director and the other Directors A2 to A 10 were also included being the responsible persons of A1 Mill.




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top