R.V.RAVEENDRAN, P.SATHASIVAM
Shankar Finance & Investments – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
Judgment
R.V. Raveendran J.
1. The complainant in a proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ('Act' for short), challenges in this appeal by special leave, the order dated 21.8.2002 passed by the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Petition No.1737 of 2001 holding that the complaint signed by a Power of Attorney holder was not maintainable.
2. The appellant - complainant filed a complaint dated 2.4.1996 against respondents 2 to 4 herein (namely M/s Speciality Aqua Ventures Ltd, its Managing Director and Chairman arrayed as accused 1, 2 and 3) alleging that a cheque for Rs.12,40,000/-issued by the third respondent (on behalf of respondents 2 to 4) was dishonoured. Respondents 2 and 4 filed an application seeking discharge. The said petition was dismissed by the learned Magistrate by order dated 17.12.1998. The Revision filed by them against the order of the learned Magistrate was rejected by the Sessions Court on 12.2.2001. Thereafter, the fourth respondent herein (third accused) filed a petition under section 482 Cr.PC for quashing the proceedings. The fourth respondent contended that he could not be arrayed as an accused as the cheque was issued by th
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani Vs. Indusind Bank Ltd. 2005 (2) SCC 217 (Para 12).
MMTC Ltd. Vs. MEDCHL Chemicals & Pharma (P) Ltd. 2002 (1) SCC 234 (Para 6).
Associated Cement Co. Ltd. Vs. Keshvanand 1998 (1) SCC 687 (Para 6).
Vishwa Mitter Vs. O.P. Poddar 1983 (4) SCC 701 (Para 6).
Nirmaljit Singh Hoon Vs. State of West Bengal 1973 (3) SCC 753 (Para 12).
Ram Chander Prasad Sharma Vs. State of Bihar and Anr. AIR 1967 SC 349 (Para 10).
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.