SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2009 Supreme(SC) 628

B.N.AGARWAL, G.S.SINGHVI
Rajesh @ Rajesh Kannan – Appellant
Versus
A. K. Murthy – Respondent


Judgment

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The appellant lodged complaint dated 6.12.2004 against respondent No.1 alleging commission of offence by the latter under various Sections of the Indian Penal Code including Sections 419, 468 and 420 read with Section 120(B) of I.P.C. After about three months, he filed Writ Petition No.3620 of 2005 before the Madras High Court for issue of a direction to the police to register the case. The same was allowed by the High Court and a direction was issued for registration of case on the basis of the appellant's complaint. Thereafter, by an order dated 16.4.2007, XI Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet, Chennai issued summons to respondent Nos.1 to 4. Respondent No.1 challenged that order in CRL. O.P. No. 20556 of 2007 and prayed that the proceedings in C.C. No. 3396 of 2007 be quashed. By the Impugned order, the High Court admitted the petition filed by respondent No.1 and directed the parties to appear before the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre by observing that the dispute may be amicably settled through mediation. Undisputedly, the offence under Section 468 I.P.C. is not compoundable. This being the position

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top