K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SURENDRA NATH LOOMBA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J. In the present batch of appeals, two preferred by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited and two preferred by claimant, the assail is to the common judgment passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in A.O. No. 201 of 2003 and A.O. No. 284 of 2003 wherein the award dated 19.5.2003 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Dehradun (for short ‘the tribunal’) in M.A.C.T. Petition No. 10 of 1999 was challenged by the insurer and the claimant from different spectrums.
2. The facts which are requisite to be stated are that on 9.10.1998 about 4.30 a.m. claimant, Surendra Nath Loomba, was travelling in a Maruti Esteem Car bearing Registration No. DL 8C5096 belonging to the respondent No. 3, Savita Matta, and driven by the respondent No. 2, Raj Loomba, the son of the claimant. Near the President Body-guard House, Rajpur Road, the vehicle dashed against a tree and in the accident the windscreen (front) of car was smashed and its pieces got inserted into the eyes of the claimant as a consequence of which he lost his both eyes. As set forth, at the time of the accident the claimant was working as a Senior Manager in Punjab National Bank and his gross sa
United India Insurance Co. Ltd., Shimla v. Tilak Singh
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Jhuma Saha (Smt.)
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Sudhakaran K.V.
New India Assurance Company Ltd. v. Sadanand Mukhi
New India Assurance Co. Ltd. V. Asha Rani
National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Laxmi Narain Dhut
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. v. Meena Variyal
Bhagyalakshmi v. United Insurance Company Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.