SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 832

AFTAB ALAM, RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI
Padmakar Tukaram Bhavnagare – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Judgment :-

RANJANA PRAKASH DESAI, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. These appeals, by special leave, are directed against the order dated 27/03/2012 passed on Criminal Application No. 15/2012 and order dated 04/05/2012 passed on Criminal Application (App.) No. 533/2012 in Criminal Application No. 15/2012 by the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court.

3. The appellants are original accused 6 and 7 respectively (“accused 6 and 7”, for brevity). Accused-6 is the husband of accused-7 and accused-5 is their daughter. The case of the complainant-Ashok Jairam Bhojane (for short “the complainant”), as evident from the F.I.R. dated 10/01/2012 lodged at Police Station, Jaulka, is that his son Nitin (the deceased) was married to accused-5 at Murtizapur in March, 2011. The deceased had given an amount of Rs.71,500/- to Baban Devlate because Baban Devlate had promised to give job to his brother-Vijay. Baban Devlate had given a cheque of Rs.50,000/- to the deceased and told him that if the job is not given, he may deposit the cheque and get the money. As Vijay did not get the job as promised, the deceased deposited the cheque in the bank. The cheque was dishonoured. Baban Devlate, his wife and children refuse








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top