P.SATHASIVAM, RANJAN GOGOI
Satya Jain – Appellant
Versus
Anis Ahmed Rushdie (D) Tr. Lrs. – Respondent
Judgment :
RANJAN GOGOI, J.
Leave granted.
2. The appellants, apart from the appellant Narendra Jain (Plaintiff No.2), claim to be the Legal heirs and representatives of the original plaintiffs 1 and 3 who had instituted suit No. 994/1977 in the High Court of Delhi seeking a decree of specific performance in respect of an agreement dated 22.12.1970 executed by and between original plaintiff No.1 (Bhikhu Ram Jain) and the original defendant Anis Ahmed Rushdie in respect of a property described as Bungalow No.4, Flag Staff Road, Civil Lines, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘suit property’). The plaintiff Nos.2 and 3 were/are the sons of the original plaintiff No.1. The suit was decreed by the learned trial judge. The decree having been reversed by a Division Bench of the High Court the present appeals have been filed by the original plaintiff No.2, Narendra Jain and the other appellants who claim to be vested with a right to sue on the basis of the claims made by the original plaintiffs in the suit. It is, however, made clear at the very outset that though all such persons claiming a right to sue through the deceased plaintiffs 1 and 3 are being referred to hereinafter as the p
P C K Muthia Chettiar v. V E S Shanmugham Chettair (D)
Muthukanni Mudaliar v. Andappa Pillai
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Manubhai Dharamasinhbhai Gajera
J.P. Builders v. A. Ramadas Rao
R.C. Chandiok v. Chuni Lal Sabharwal
N.P. Thirugnanam v. Dr. R. Jagan Mohan Rao
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.