SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 939

T.S.THAKUR, FAKKIR MOHAMED IBRAHIM KALIFULLA
PARAM PAL SINGH THROUGH FATHER – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - There is a finding of CAUSAL CONNECTION between death and employment as a truck driver, supporting compensation under the Act (!) (!) (!) (!) - Adoption of the appellant by the deceased was held to be valid based on documentary and oral evidence, affecting the claimant’s status as a dependent (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - The death occurred while the deceased was performing driving duties and the death was considered an untoward mishap arising out of and in the course of employment, constituting an accident for compensation purposes (!) (!) (!) (!)

What is the eligibility for compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act when there is a claimed causal connection between death and employment in a truck-driver scenario?

What is the validity and effect of adoption as a basis for dependency rights in Workmen’s Compensation claims?

What constitutes an "accident arising out of and in the course of employment" for death benefits under the Act?


JUDGMENT

Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla, J.-Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Delhi passed in FAO No.184/2005 dated 23.05.2007. The said appeal before the High Court arose out of an award passed by the Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner in its order dated 29.12.2004 in WCD/113/NWD/02. The Workmen’s Compensation Commissioner determined the compensation payable to the appellant herein in a sum of Rs.2,20,280/- along with another sum of Rs.2500/- as funeral charges under Section 4(4) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act. A separate show-cause-notice was issued for payment of interest and penalty. The respondent herein preferred the abovesaid appeal in FAO No.184/2005 in which the High Court passed the impugned order setting aside the order passed by the Commissioner. It is in the abovesaid background the appellant-claimant has come forward with this appeal.

3. At the very outset, it is required to be stated that the appellant claimed himself to be the adopted son of the deceased Jeet Singh @ Ajit Singh. According to the claimant the deceased Jeet Singh @ Ajit Singh was employed as Truck Driver by the second respondent herein to drive t















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top