SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(SC) 761

HARJIT SINGH BEDI, GYAN SUDHA MISRA
Batcha @ Guramkonda Garika Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants: -------.
For the Respondent: --------.

Judgment :

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

We are told by the learned counsel for the appellants that appellant No. 2 Gurramkonda Hari has passed away on 25th November, 2008. The appeal qua appellant No. 2 is, accordingly, dismissed as having abated.

We see that the prosecution story is based on two dying declarations given by the deceased, one recorded by a Sub Inspector and the other by a Magistrate and that both the dying declarations had been recorded after the doctor had certified that the injured was in a fit condition to make her statement.

In the light of this fact, no other evidence was necessary to maintain the conviction of the appellant. We, accordingly, dismiss the appeal.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top