SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 41

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.K. Jain & Jagdish Singh Khehar, JJ.
Kavi Raj & Others - Appellants
Versus
State of J&K & Ors. - Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 162 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP (C) No.5042 of 2006)
WITH
Reva Gaind & Others …. Appellants
Versus
State of J&K & Ors. …. Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2013
(Arising out of SLP (C) No.5893 of 2006
Decided On : 09-01-2013

Headnote:

Constitution of India,1950 - Article 14 - Jammu & Kashmir Medical Education (Gazetted) Service Recruitment Rules, 1979 – Advertisement - canvass claim - Assistant Surgeons Health and Medical Education Department of State of Jammu & Kashmir addressed a requisition to Jammu & Kashmir Public Service Commission hereinafter referred to as Public Service Commission to recruit posts of Assistant Surgeons. Based on aforesaid requisition Public Service Commission issued notification for inviting applications posts of Assistant Surgeons in the pay-scale - Based on aforesaid notification an advertisement appeared newspapers inviting applications posts of Assistant Surgeons belonging to Health and Medical Education Department - Public Service Commission after completing the process of selection prepared select list successful candidates –Held, Single Judge Court are of view that decision of controversy by this Court pertaining Assistant Surgeons whose claim was decided by the impugned order constitutes declaration of law and is binding Articles Constitution of India - Such being the stature of determination rendered in respect Assistant Surgeons whose claim was adjudicated by Letters Patent Bench of High Court are of the view that same should if permissible also be extended other Assistant Surgeons Court two Special Leave Petitions were filed - Assistant Surgeons against whom Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed in default are also before this Court - They have also been afforded an opportunity of hearing - This Court has expressed the opinion that the order passed by the Letters Patent Bench of the High Court on deserves If Assistant Surgeons whose Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed in default had not been before this Court it may not have been possible for us to re-adjudicate upon their claim - Since all of them are before us and have been represented through counsel Court have no doubt in our mind that determination on merits in instant controversy should be extended to them as well - Since such choice can be made present case Court are of view that proposition which has been upheld as legal should extended to the others similarly situated converse proposition does not commend itself for acceptance - It would be unthinkable to implement an order which has been set aside after due notice and hearing Court therefore find no merit in the technical plea advanced at the hands of the learned counsel for the appellants –appeal allowed

JUDGMENT

JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. Consequent upon the creation of posts of Assistant Surgeons, the Health and Medical Education Department of the State of Jammu & Kashmir, addressed a requisition to the Jammu & Kashmir Public Service Commission (hereinafter referred to as “the Public Service Commission”) to recruit 1255 posts of Assistant Surgeons. Based on the aforesaid requisition, the Public Service Commission issued a notification dated 31.12.1996 for inviting applications for 1255 posts of Assistant Surgeons in the pay-scale of Rs.2200-4000. Based on the aforesaid notification, an advertisement dated 2.1.1997 appeared in newspapers inviting applications for 1255 posts of Assistant Surgeons, belonging to the Health and Medical Education Department.

3. In June, 1997 the Public Service Commission after completing the process of selection, prepared a select list of successful candidates. The names of the appellants herein, appeared in the list of successful candidates. Consequent upon the selection of the appellants as Assistant Surgeons by the Public Service Commission, the Department of Health and Medical Education, issued an order dated 12.8.1997 appointing the appellants against the advertised posts of Assistant Surgeons. An extract of the aforesaid order, relevant to the present controversy, is being reproduced hereunder:

“The candidates belonging to Jammu region shall report to Director Health Services, Jammu and those belonging to Kashmir region to Director Health Services Kashmir for further postings. As regards migrant candidates they shall report to Director, Health Services Jammu for further orders.” (emphasis is ours)

It is not a matter of dispute, that in furtherance of the order of appointment dated 12.8.1997, all the appellants reported to the Director, Health Services, Jammu as they all belonged to the Jammu region. The next step, as is evident from the extracted portion of the appointment order, was the appellants’ actual posting.

4. A Government Order pertaining to the posting of Assistant Surgeons, was issued by the Department of Health and Medical Education on 17.7.1997. Paragraph 5 of the aforesaid Government Order is relevant, and is accordingly being extracted hereunder:

“5. The Doctors appointed against General category shall be posted in various Hospitals in the following orders:

a) Allopathic Dispensaries

b) Primary Health Centres and Police Hospitals;

c) Community Health Centres;

d) Sub-District Hospitals;

e) District Hospitals;

f) Hospitals of Jammu and Srinagar including Evening/Urban Clinic and after that in Medical Education and other organizations;

g) Surgeons shall be posted only in such Hospitals where Operation Theatres are available and the Hospitals are housed in Govt. Buildings.”

Sub-paragraph (f) of paragraph 5 extracted hereinabove leaves no room for any doubt, that Assistant Surgeons could be posted in Hospitals of Jammu and Srinagar including evening/urban clinics, “….and after that…”, in medical education and other organizations. In consonance with the Government Order dated 17.7.1997, the Principal, Government Medical College, Jammu, by an Office Order dated 30.12.1997, posted all the appellants against the vacant posts of Senior/Junior House Officers, at the Government Medical College, Jammu (and at hospitals associated with the said college).

5. Despite posting of the appellants at the Government Medical College, Jammu (and/or at hospitals associated therewith), on 30.12.1997; within a week thereof, by an order dated 7.1.1998, the Principal, Government Medical College, Jammu, reverted the appellants to their parent Department, namely, the Directorate of Health Service, Jammu. The instant order dated 7.1.1978 was first assailed by the appellants before the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir (hereinafter referred to as “the High Court”). It is now the subject matter of challenge by them, before this Court. Since the present controversy relates to the order dated 7.1.1998, whereby,


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top