A.K.PATNAIK, ANIL R.DAVE
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Central Excise, Vadodara – Respondent
Judgment :-
A.K. PATNAIK, J.
CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 4530-4532 OF 2005:
These are appeals under Section 35L (b) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order dated 15.03.2005 of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, West Zonal Bench, Mumbai, (for short “the Tribunal”).
2. The facts very briefly are that the appellant produces inter alia Reduced Crude Oil (for short “RCO”). By Notification No. 75/84-CE dated 01.03.1984, the Central government in exercise of its powers under Sub-Rule 1 of Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 (for short “the Rules”) exempted goods described in Column 3 of the table annexed to the notification from so much of the duty of excise as is specified in the notification subject to the intended use, or the conditions, if any, laid down in Column 5 of the table annexed to the notification. One of the goods exempted from excise duty by the notification was RCO, if produced only from indigenous crude oil subject to intended use as fuel for generation of electrical energy by electricity undertakings owned or controlled by the Central Government or any State Government or any State Electricity Board or any local authority or any licensee under
M/s Chunni Lal Parshadi Lal v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P., Lucknow
Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi v. Harichand Shri Gopal
Thermax Private Limited v. The Collector of Customs (Bombay), New Customs House
Collector of Customs, Bombay v. J.K. Synthetics Limited
Collector of Central Excise, Jaipur v. J.K. Synthetics
Commissioner of Central Excise, New Delhi v. Hari Chand Shri Gopal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.