A.K.PATNAIK, H.L.GOKHALE
Hiraman – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Judgment :-
H.L. Gokhale J.
This Criminal Appeal raises the question about the relevance of dying declarations, and the approach to be adopted by the Courts with respect thereto. The appellant’s wife, Chandrakala Hiraman Murkute, died an unnatural and a very painful death at about 2 a.m. on 7.4.2000 in a village in Jamkhed Taluka of District Ahmednagar, State of Maharashtra, having suffered 91% burn injuries in the previous night leading to cardio-respiratory failure. The First Adhoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar held the appellant responsible for the same, principally on the basis of her dying declarations, and convicted him for cruelty and murder under Sections 498-A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code (I.P.C. for short) by his judgment and order dated 16.8.2004 in Sessions Case No.103 of 2000. The conviction U/s 302 of IPC was confirmed by the Aurangabad Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Criminal Appeal No.31 of 2005, though the one under Section 498-A of I.P.C was set-aside for the lack of sufficient evidence. The Courts below have accepted the two dying declarations of deceased Chandrakala as giving the correct cause for the burn injuries viz. that they were cau
P. Mani v. State of Tamil Nadu
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay
Mannu Raja v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Gulam Hussain v. State of Delhi
Kanaksingh Raisingh v. State of Gujarat
Babu Lal v. State of State of Madhya Pradesh
Shivaji Sahebrao Bobade v. State of Maharashtra
State of U.P. v. Krishna Gopal
Gurbachan Singh v. Satpal Singh
Gangadhar Behera v. State of Orissa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.