SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(SC) 595

A.N. Grover, K.S. Hegde, JJ.
STATE OF TAMIL NADU
Versus
THIRUMAGAL MILLS LTD.
Civil Appeals Nos. 1454 of 1969 and 148 of 1971
Decided On: Decided On : 17-11-1971

Advocates Appeared:
S.T. Desai, Senior Advocate (A.V. Rangam, Advocate, with him), for the appellant.
K. Parasaran, T. Vadivel, R. Shanmugham and K. Jayaram, Advocates, for the respondent in C.A. No. 1454 of 1969 (Thirumagal Mills Ltd.).
T.A. Ramachandran, Advocate, for the respondent in C.A. No. 148 of 1971.
B. Sen, Senior Advocate (S.P. Mitra and G.S. Chatterjee, Advocates, with him), for the intervener.

Headnote:

Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959 – Section 9, 2 – Sales Tax – Assessee, who is the respondent herein, is a spinning mill manufacturing cotton yarn. – It was assessed to sales tax under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, – For the assessment year 1960-61 the assessing authority included in the taxable turnover certain amounts representing the sale value of foodgrains and groceries sold in the fair price shop run by the mills and the amount realised by sale of articles of food in the canteen which was run for its employees. – Assessee filed an appeal questioning its liability to pay tax on these items. – Appellate authority dismissed that appeal. – Assessee thereupon filed a further appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal which allowed the appeal and directed that the turnover in question be deleted. – Revenue went up in revision to the High Court of Madras. – A Division Bench of that court dismissed the revision – Held, Definition of "business" was substituted by the Second Amendment Act of 1964 it was not made retrospective by the usual words that it should be deemed to have been always substituted nor was any other language employed to show that the substantive provision, namely, the definition of "business" was being amended retrospectively. – Section 9, therefore, can be of no avail to the revenue. – It has been pointed out that in the other decision rendered by this court, in which similar validation provision appeared, the substantive section had not been amended at all. That, in our judgment, will not make any difference because the essence of the matter is that the definition of the word "business" which was material was amended only prospectively and not with retrospective effect. – It is common ground and has not been disputed that if retrospective operasion is not given to section 2(d) of the Second Amendment Act, 1964, the revenue must fail in these appeals. – Court may add that we have not considered the question of the liability of the assessee to be assessed subsequent to the amendment made by the Second Amendment Act of 1964. – Appeals Dismissed

JUDGMENT

GROVER, J.

These appeals by special leave from a judgment of the Madras High Court involve a common question.

The facts in the first of these appeals may be stated. The assessee, who is the respondent herein, is a spinning mill manufacturing cotton yarn. It was assessed to sales tax under the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, hereinafter called the "Act". For the assessment year 1960-61 the assessing authority included in the taxable turnover certain amounts representing the sale value of foodgrains and groceries sold in the fair price shop run by the mills and the amount realised by sale of articles of food in the canteen which was run for its employees. The assessee filed an appeal questioning its liability to pay tax on these items. The appellate authority dismissed that appeal. The assessee thereupon filed a further appeal to the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal which allowed the appeal and directed that the turnover in question be deleted. The revenue went up in revision to the High Court of Madras. A Division Bench of that court dismissed the revision.

The Appellate Tribunal had found that the fair price shop and the canteen were run exclusively for the benefit of the employees and there was no profit-motive in running the same. The High Court referred to the relevant statutory provisions and expressed the view that the primary requisite of "business" as defined by the Act should be a trade or commerce or adventure in the nature of trade or commerce. Presence or absence of profit was not material but the activity must be of a commercial character in the course of trade or commerce. It was found that the assessee had not been carrying on business in the fair price shop. The High Court looked into the articles of association of the assessee and found no article empowering it to carry on business in fair price shop. The assessee had opened that shop only to provide an amenity to its workmen so that commodities may be made available to them at fair prices. According to the High Court if as a matter of fact some profit accrued that would be wholly immaterial because the assessee never intended to run the fair price shop as a business having an element of commercial activity.

Section 2 of the Act gives the definitions. The definitions of "business" given in clause (d), of "dealer" as given in clause (g) and of "sale" as given in clause (n) are reproduced below :

"(d) 'business' includes any trade, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture, whether or not any profit accrues from such trade, commerce, manufacture, adventure or concern.

(g) 'dealer' means any person who carries on the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods, directly or otherwise, whether for cash or for deferred payment or for commission, remuneration or other valuable consideration, and includes ......

(iii) a commission agent, a broker or a del credere agent, or an auctioneer or any other mercantile agent, by whatever name called, who carries on the business of buying, selling, supplying or distributing goods on behalf of any principal ......

(n) 'sale' with all its grammatical variations and cognate expressions means every transfer of the property in goods by one person to another in the course of business for cash or for deferred payment or other valuable consideration, and includes a transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a works contract, but does not include a mortgage, hypothecation, charge or pledge."

By the Madras General Sales Tax (Second Amendment) Act, 1964, clause (d) of section 2 was substituted by the following clause :

"'business' includes -

(i) any trade, commerce or manufacture or any adventure or concern in the nature of trade, commerce or manufacture, whether or not such trade, commerce, manufacture, adventure or concern is carried on with a motive to make gain or profit and whether or not any profit accrues from such trade, commerce, ma











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top