SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1998 Supreme(SC) 963

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
D.P. Wadhwa, S.P. Bharucha, Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, JJ.
FATEH MAIDAN CLUB
Versus
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, HYDERABAD AND ANOTHER (AND OTHER CASES).
Civil Appeals No. 1501 of 1996 with C.A. Nos. 268 to 274 of 1996 (Civil Appeals Nos. 272 to 274 and 1501 of 1996 are from the judgment and order dt. March 4, 1992, in Writ Petition No. 13441 of 1985 and the judgment and order dt. February 14, 1992, in Writ Petition Nos. 12920 of 1988, 3598 of 1989 and 8580 of 1990 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court),
Decided On: Decided On : 10-09-1998

Advocates Appeared:
P. P. Rao, D. R. K. Reddy, Ms. B. Jayashree, A. Ranganathan, B. A. Ranganathan, A. V. Rangam, Ms. Rani Chhabra - Appellant.
T. V. S. N. Chari, K. Ram Kumar, Ms. Asha G. Nair - Respondents.

ORDER

The appellants are members' clubs. They are in appeal by special leave against the judgment and order of a Division Bench of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh ([1992] 87 STC 227 (AP)), and subsequent orders ([1992] 87 STC 341 (AP)) following the same, whereby it was held that the appellants are liable to pay sales tax under the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 on the supplies of food and drink to their members.

A principle contention on behalf of the appellants is that when a members' club supplies food or drink to its members, there is no sale because a members' club only acts as the agent of the member. Reliance is placed in this behalf upon the judgments of this court in Secretary, the Madras Gymkhana Club Employees Union v. Management of the Gymkhana Club [1968] 1 SCR 742 and Joint Commercial Taxes Officer, Harbour Division - II, Madras v. Young Men's Indian Association [1970] 1 SCC 462 ([1970] 26 STC 241 (SC)). In the former case it was held that a club belongs to the members for the time being on its list of members. Thus, members can deal with the club as they like. A club is identified with its members at a given point of time, so that it cannot be said that a club has an existence apart from its members. Even more relevant to the issue is the decision in the case of Young Men's Indian Association [1970] 1 SCC 462 ([1970] 26 STC 241 (SC)) which dealt with the very question, namely, "Whether the supply of various preparations by each club to its members involves a transaction of sale ?" It was held, based upon the definition of "sale" in the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, that there was no sale exigible to tax "if there is no transfer of property from one to another. ... If the club, even though a distinct legal entity, is only acting as an agent for its members in matter of supply of various preparations to them, no sale would be involved as the element of transfer would be completely absent".

In some of the present matters the appellants filed writ petitions against notices seeking to assess them to sales tax on the supply of food and beverages to their members. There was, therefore, no determination by the fact-finding authorities of the relationship between the appellants and their members in the matter of supply by the former to the latter of food and drink and such like; that is to say, was the club acting as the agent of the members or did the property in the food and drink pass from the club to the members ? In the other matters the High Court was approached after orders of assessment had been made and appeals filed but there was no inquiry into the said relationship. We think it appropriate, therefore, that the matters should go back to the assessing authorities who will determine, on facts in regard to each appellant. What was the said relationship and, with that finding in mind, decide, whether or not the appellants are liable to sales tax in this behalf under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957. All contentions that are available both to the appellants and the sales tax authorities are left open and may be raised. The decisions shall be reached without reference to the judgment of the High Court that is under appeal.

The appeals are allowed. The judgment and orders under appeal are set aside, as also the aforementioned orders of assessment and orders in appeal therefrom.

No order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top