SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(SC) 183

SUPREME COURT (From : Patna)
K. C. DAS GUPTA, J. R. MUDHOLKAR AND T. L. VENKATARAMA AIYAR, JJ.
Baleshwar Rai alias Nepali Master etc. - Appellants
v.
State of Bihar (in all appeals) - Respondent
Criminal Appeals Nos. 176 to 178 of 1961
Decided on: 26-4-1962

Advocates Appeared:
M/s. Sushil Kumar Jha, Subodh Kumar Jha and R.C. Prasad, Advocates, for Appellants (in all the Appeals);
Mr. C.K. Daphtary, Solicitor-General of India (Mr. S.P. Varma, Advocate, with him), for Respondent (In all the appeals).

Common intention to commit murder can be inferred from facts and circumstances, and an anonymous letter can be admissible in evidence if it is not made during the course of investigation and is relevant to the motive for the crime.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - MURDER - COMMON INTENTION - IDENTIFICATION - ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE - SECTION 162 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - ANONYMOUS LETTER - SECTION 21 OF THE EVIDENCE ACT - CORROBORATION.

Fact of the Case:

The appellants were convicted of murder by the Additional Sessions Judge, Monghyr, and their sentences of death were confirmed by the High Court of Patna. They appealed to the Supreme Court by special leave.

Finding of the Court:

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals, holding that the evidence against the appellants was sufficient to establish their guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Issues: 1. Whether common intention to commit murder was established with respect to all the appellants? 2. Whether the identification of the appellants was legally permissible? 3. Whether the anonymous letter (Ext. 6) was admissible in evidence?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Common intention to commit murder was established with respect to all the appellants based on the facts that they came together, two of them had guns, and they had a motive to kill the deceased. 2. The identification of the appellants was legally permissible as it was made by multiple witnesses who had an opportunity to see them. 3. The anonymous letter (Ext. 6) was admissible in evidence as it was not made during the course of investigation and was relevant to the motive for the murder.

Final Decision: The appeals were dismissed.

JUDGEMENT

MUDHOLKAR, J. :- This judgement will govern Criminal Appeals Nos. 177 and 178 also. All these three appeals arise out of the same trial. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Monghyr, who conducted the trial convicted the appellant, Ramchandra Chandhary who is appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 177 of 1961 for an offence under S. 302 Indian Penal Code. He also convicted Baleshwar Rai alias Nepali Master, appellant in this appeal and Jogendra Choudhary, appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 178 of 1961 of an offence under S. 302 read with S. 34, Indian Penal Code. He sentenced each of the three to death. Their appeals were dismissed by the High Court of Patna, and sentences of death passed against them were confirmed by it. They have come up before this Court by special leave.

2. The prosecution story is briefly as follows :-

On March 17, 1959, at about 8.00 p.m. the chaukidars of the village Fateha had assembled, as usual, in the 'crime centre' of the village. Their names are Anandi Paswan (deceased), Misri Paswan (P.W. 2), Baleshwar Paswan (P.W. 3) and Narain Paswan. Anandi Paswan and Misri Paswan were lying on a chauki. Anandi Paswan had a 'bhala' and 'muretha' while Misri Paswan had a 'pharsa' and a 'Muretha'. These weapons as well as the shirt of the deceased were kept on the chauki. The other two chaukidars were lying on the ground. The crime centre is housed in the 'dalan' of Tilak Chaudhary (P.W. 6). One other person, Srilai Chaudhary (P.W. 7), the brother of Tilak Chaudhary, was also lying there on a khatia on the north-east of the said 'dalan'. In an adjacent room were P.W. 11 Nathuni Chaudhary alias Durga Das and P.W. 12 Ramchander Jha.

3. According to the prosecution a little before 9.00 p.m. someone from outside called out "Darogaji". On hearing this, the deceased Anandi Paswan and Misri Paswan got up. It was a moonlit night and they saw Ramchandra Chaudhary, Jogendra Chaudhary and another person, who was later identified to be Nepali Master, standing closeby. As soon as they went towards the appellants, Jogendra Chaudhary and Nepali Master caught the deceased while Ram Chandra Chaudhary caught Misri Paswan. Both Ramchandra Chaudhary and Jogendra Chaudhary had guns with them which were slung across their shoulders. These three persons then took the deceased and Misri Paswan to the road to the East of the 'dalan', running north to south, and proceeded southward. Neither the deceased nor Misrj Paswan raised any cry, apparently because they were threatened that if they did so, they would be shot. When the party reached a place to the west of one Peare Sao's house and to the east of the house of Rampratap Tanti (P.W. 5), the deceased called for Rampratap's help, and freeing himself from the clutches of his captors started running away westward. Upon this Ramchandra Chaudhary let go the hand of Misri Paswan and fired at the deceased. Misri Paswan then ran into the house of Peare Sao and took shelter there. While entering that house, he heard a second, gun shot. His presence in the house was detected by Mst. Ajo (P.W. 8), the wife of Peare Sao who forced him to leave the house. Thereafter he came out into the lane and concealed himself behind the door. After the moon had set and it became dark, he went to the house of Fakir Paswan (P.W. 4), which is to the east of the house of Peare Sao, and narrated the occurrence to him. He mentioned Ramchandra and Jogendra as the two persons who had taken part in the incident. In the early hours of the morning he went to the place where gun shots were fired, and found Anandi Paswan, Chaukidar lying dead in a ditch by the side of the road, face downwards. He noticed that Anandi Paswan, had received two gun shot wounds on his back. Thereafter he went home and contacted the other chaukidar, Narain-Paswan and Baleswar Paswan. He placed them in charge of the dead body and then went to the police station along with Ramdeo, son of the deceased. He lodged the first information report at the p















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top