SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(SC) 39

AHMED ALI KHAN
Nanjayya Hegde – Appellant
Versus
Mahabala Shetty – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K. Jagannatha Shetty, for Petitioner;
P. Ganapathy Bhat, for Respondents Nos. 1 to 3.

ORDER

This Revision Petition is directed against the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Coondapur on 3rd July 1967 in M. C. 3 of 1966 on the file of his Court in a proceeding under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. In that proceeding a preliminary order against the Respondent was passed to remove the obstruction alleged to have been caused by him in a mamool pathway in Abbedi village. The petitioner had alleged that there existed a mamool pathway passing through S. Nos. 92, 245, 102/1 and 101 of Abbedi village and that the respondent was obstructing the use of the said pathway. It was further alleged by him that the pathway was a public pathway. But the respondent contended that the pathway was a private cart track and not a public pathway as alleged by the petitioner. The trying Magistrate was of the view that the pathway was not a public pathway as alleged by the petitioner and by the order in revision set aside the preliminary order passed by him.

2. Mr. Jagannatha Shetty, learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the Magistrate has not followed the obligatory provision contained in Section 139-A of the Code of Criminal Procedure and therefore the ord






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top