SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 215

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.S. SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, JJ.
INDIAN SOAPS & TOILETRIES MAKERS ASSOCIATION - Appellants.
VERSUS
OZAIR HUSAIN AND OTHERS - Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER - Appellants.
VERSUS
OZAIR HUSAIN - Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 5644 of 2003 with Civil Appeal No. 5645 of 2003
Decided On : 7-3-2013.

Writ petition - maintainability.
Separation of powers - limitation on jurisdiction of Courts.

Headnote:(a) Constitution of India - Article 19(2) - Freedom of speech and expression includes right to receive information - But such right can be limited by reasonable restrictions. (Paras 18 and 19)

        (1975) 4 SCC 428; (1995) 2 SCC 161; (1998) 4 SCC 626 - Referred

        (b) Constitution of India - Article 226 - High Court directing the Executive to exercise power by way of subordinate legislation to enact a law in a particular fashion - High Court also suggesting interim arrangement till such enactment - Not permissible. (Para 29)

        (1982) 1 SCC 271; (1989) 4 SCC 187; (2007) 6 SCC 805; (2002) 5 SCC 294 - Relied upon

        (c) Constitution of India - Article 226 r/w Rule 105, Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945 - Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 or the 1945 Rules not providing for labeling of drugs and cosmetics as to their vegetarian or non-vegetarian origin - Advisory Committee already deliberating and rejecting such suggestion - Writ petition was not maintainable. (Para 29)

       Facts of the case:

        This case relates to the right of consumer to know ingredients of cosmetics etc. as to their origin whether vegetarian or non-vegetarian and liability of the Company as to the required disclosure.

       Finding of the Court:

        Impugned judgment cannot be sustained.

       Result : Appeals allowed.

       

JUDGMENT

Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya, J.:-

These appeals have been preferred by the appellants against the judgment dated 13th November, 2002 passed by the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in a Public Interest Litigation (Civil Writ Petition No.837 of 2001) whereby the High Court held that the consumer has the fundamental right to know whether the food products, cosmetics and drugs available for human consumption are of non-vegetarian or vegetarian origin and ordered as follows: "In so far as cosmetics are concerned, the same must be treated at par with articles/packages of food for the purpose of disclosure of their ingredients.

Till such time the requisite amendments are carried out, we direct as under:-

(1) Where a cosmetic or a drug other than life saving drug, as the case may be, contains ingredients of non- vegetarian origin, the package shall carry label bearing the following symbol in red colour on the principal display panel just close a proximity to name or brand name of the drug or cosmetic:-

(2) Where a cosmetic or a drug other than life saving drug, as the case may be, contains ingredients wholly of vegetarian origin, the package shall bear the following symbol in green colour on the principal display panel just close in proximity to name or brand name of the drug or cosmetic:-

(3) Where a cosmetic or a drug other than life saving drug has ingredients of vegetarian of non- vegetarian origin, a declaration shall be made in writing on the package indicating the nature of the origin of the product.

(4) The Director General of Health Services/Drugs Controller General, Government of India, shall issue a list of Life Saving Drugs within a period of two months.”

2. The Public Interest Litigation was filed by the respondent claiming the right of a consumer of cosmetics, drugs and articles of food to the full disclosure of ingredients of such product whereby a clear indication as to its origin (vegetarian/non-vegetarian) is made. The High Court referring to the constitutional rights guaranteed under Articles 19(1)(a), Articles 21 and 25 of the Constitution of India held:

“…………..It seems to us that to enable a person to practise the beliefs and opinions which he holds, in a meaningful manner, it is essential for him to receive the relevant information, otherwise he maybe prevented from acting in consonance with his beliefs and opinions. In case a vegetarian consumer does not know the ingredients of cosmetics, drugs or food products which he/she wishes to buy, it will be difficult for him or her to practise vegetarianism. In the aforesaid context, freedom of expression enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) can serve two broad purposes – (1) it can help the consumer to discover the truth about the composition of the products, whether made of animals including birds and fresh water or marine animals or eggs, and (2) it can held him to fulfil his belief or opinion in vegetarianism.”

“…..In this view of the matter, we have no hesitation in holding that Article 21 grants freedom to an individual to follow and to stick to his opinions, and for pursuing such a course he had right to receive information and also a right to know the ingredients or the constituents of cosmetics, drugs and food products.”

“……In view of the aforesaid discussion, we are of the view that it is the fundamental right of the consumers to know whether the food products, cosmetics and drugs are of non- vegetarian or vegetarian origin, as otherwise it will violate their fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(a), 21 and 25 of the Constitution. Accordingly, we answer the main question in the affirmative. Since there is a constitutionally guaranteed right of the consumers to the full disclosure of the ingredients of cosmetics, drugs and articles of food, answers to remaining questions (ii) and (iii) necessarily are required to be answered in the affirmative. We, accordingly, answer the questions (ii) and (iii) also in the affirmative……”

“……In so far as food products





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top