S.S.NIJJAR, M.Y.EQBAL
RAJU GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF TRIPURA – Respondent
ORDER
1. Leave granted.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties at length. Application for deletion of the names of Respondent Nos.4 to 8 is allowed.
3. This appeal, by special leave, has been filed against the interim order dated 3.7.2012 passed by the Gauhati High Court, Agartala Bench in Writ Appeal No.23 of 2012. At the time of issuing notice in the special leave petition, this Court had stayed the operation of the impugned order passed by the High Court. It is brought to our notice by Mr. Jaideep Gupta, learned senior counsel appearing for the State of Tripura that the elections are due to be held in February, 2013. There is acute shortage of police personnel in the State of Tripura. Therefore, it is necessary that the proceedings in this matter are finalized with utmost expedition. The aforesaid position is not disputed by Mr. Rana Mukherjee, learned counsel appearing for the appellants, who, in fact, submitted that his clients had not sought any adjournment before the High Court and they are ready and willing to go ahead with the hearing of the writ appeal.
4. We are of the opinion that it would be in the interest of justice if the High Court takes up the hearing of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.