SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 243

H.L.DATTU, RANJAN GOGOI
Vijay Kumar Thakur – Appellant
Versus
State of Karnataka – Respondent


ORDER

1. Rule nisi.

2. The main prayer sought for in this Writ Petition filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, is as under: "A) Issue necessary directions to the Director, CBI, New Delhi-Respondent No.4 for conducting fair and impartial investigation into the matter so as to find out the real culprits involved in the murder case to meet the ends of justice;

3. "Shri Siddharth Luthra, learned Additional Solicitor General, appearing for some of the respondents in the Writ Petition would seek for modification in grant of the aforesaid prayer and submit that instead of this Court directing the Director, CBI, New Delhi to conduct the investigation into the complaint filed by the petitioner, the same could be conducted by the State Criminal Investigation Department (for short 'the C.I.D.'), headed by a police officer of the rank of Director General of Police (for short 'the D.G.P.).

4. Though Shri Nagendra Rai, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner has some reservations on the aforesaid submission made by Shri Luthra, we are of the considered opinion that the same appears to be very reasonable and, if the complaint filed by the petitioner is transferred to the Sta




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top