SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 193

RANJAN GOGOI, H.L.DATTU
PADMALAYAN – Appellant
Versus
SARASAN – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in Criminal Revision Petition No.1831 of 2004, dated 11.10.2012. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has confirmed the orders passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Appeal No.12 of 2011, dated 11.3.2004.

3. On a private complaint filed by the respondents herein for offences under Sections 141, 142, 143, 148, 149, 307, 324, 37 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('the IPC' for short), the learned Magistrate had convicted the appellants herein and had sentenced them to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two years alongwith fine under Section 324 of the IPC. Being aggrieved by the said order, the accused persons had approached the learned Sessions Judge. The learned Judge, while confirming the conviction of the accused, has modified the sentence to one year simple imprisonment and for payment of Rs.10,000/- as fine on each of the appellants, and, in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment of six months. Aggrieved by the said order, the accused persons had filed a Criminal Revision Petition before the High Court. T





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top