KURIAN JOSEPH, R.M.LODHA, MADAN B.LOKUR
Manohar Lal Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment :-
We have heard Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma – petitioner in person and Mr. Goolam E. Vahanvati, learned Attorney General. We have also heard Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, learned counsel for the intervenor – Swadeshi Jagaran Foundation in I.A. No. 2 of 2012.
2. Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma – petitioner in person prays for withdrawal of the rejoinder-affidavit in its entirety in view of the objectionable statements contained therein. We allow him to do so. It is directed that no part of the rejoinder-affidavit shall be treated as part of the record.
3. In the Writ Petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing Press Note Nos. 4,5,6,7 and 8 of (2012 Series) dated 20th September, 2012 being unconstitutional and without any authority of law.
4. By these Press Notes, the policy of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Single-Brand Product Retail Trading, Multi-Brand Retail Trading, Air Transport Services, Broadcasting Carriage Services and Power Exchanges has been reviewed. In the forwarding circular, it is mentioned in para 5 that necessary amendments to Foreign Exchange Management (Transfer or Issue of Security by a Person Resident Outside India) Regulations, 2000 (for short “Regulations, 2000) a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.