SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 756

R.M.LODHA, ANIL R.DAVE
Newton Engineering & Chem. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. – Respondent


Judgment :-

We have heard Mr. Jagdeep Kishore, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Chetan Sharma, learned senior counsel for the respondents.

2. Leave granted.

3. It is not necessary to refer to the facts of the case. Suffice it to say that the arbitration clause in the agreement between the parties provides that all disputes and differences between them shall be referred by any aggrieved party to the contract to the sole arbitration of ED(NR) of the respondent No. 1 - Indian Oil Corporation (for short, 'Corporation'). Arbitration clause further provides that, if such ED(NR) is unable or unwilling to act as the sole arbitrator, the matter shall be referred to the sole arbitration of some other person designated by such ED(NR) in his place who is willing to act as sole arbitrator. The arbitration clause also provides that no person other than ED(NR) or the person designated by the ED(NR) should act as arbitrator.

4. It is admitted case that when the disputes arose between the parties, the present appellant - M/s Newton Engineering and Chemicals Limited (for short, 'Contractor') wrote to the Corporation for appointment of ED(NR) as sole arbitrator as per the arbitration clause. T








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top