SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 652

K.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, DIPAK MISRA
Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Wel. Assn. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


ORDER

Heard learned counsel on either sides at length.

When the matter came up for hearing on 9.7.2013, in order to give a quietus to the entire dispute, we felt it appropriate that all the parties and their counsel meet together and file a Consensus Memo/Common Note latest by 11.7.2013.

Following the said order, an undated Memo of Submissions signed by Shri Piyush Sharma (for Okhla Enclave Plot Holders Welfare Association) and Shri P. Narasimhan (for Durga Builder Plot Holder Association) was submitted on 9.7.2013, jointly praying for the following directions:

1. DGT&CP Haryana be directed to take over the available licensed area as indicated in his affidavit and retain it in his custody to facilitate the process of allotment till further orders. He shall be responsible for watch and ward, care and custody of this property and will be its custodian till the dispute is resolved.

2. DGTPC Haryana may be directed to take steps thereafter to finalize a final list of claimants taking in regard the exercise already undertaken by him, pursuant to this Court’s direction dated 22.4.2013 the identification/determination of 2196 entitlements by the Ld. Court Commissioner, besides 844 persons by






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top