SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 692

Supreme Court of India
R.M. LODHA, J. CHELAMESWAR, MADAN B. LOKUR, JJ.
State Bank of India Thr. General Manager
Versus
National Housing Bank & Others
Civil Appeal No. 2155 of 1999 with Civil Appeal No. 2294 of 1999 Civil Appeal No. 3647 of 1999
Decided On : 31-07-2013

Headnote:

Special Court Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities Act 27 of 1992 - Section 10 - above-mentioned Act - Section 5 - Special Court Act - Section 9-A - transactions – payment of costs - Stock market in year when large scale irregularities and malpractices were noticed in both Government and other securities indulged in by some brokers in collusion with employees of various banks and financial institutions In course of investigations by Reserve Bank of India large scale irregularities and malpractices were noticed in transactions in both Government and other securities indulged in by some brokers in collusion with employees of various bonds and financial institutions - Irregularities and malpractices led to diversion of funds from banks and financial institutions to individual accounts of certain brokers – Held, Special Court had gone into all aspects of matter including transaction of with Standard Chartered Bank and Cantina before arriving at his conclusions - Honble Court has also gone into alteration in cherub initial stand of before Court etc - Court has even awarded costs to and others looking into conduct of SBS before - Honble Court has also observed that each transaction has to be dealt with independently and did not agree with contention of about satisfaction of its liability by delivery of bonds by Harsh ad Mehta to Cantina - Amicable solution is concerned all along has insisted that it be given total amount received by NHB for which is not agreeable - Thus it was felt that Special Court has looked into all above aspects of matter and has given its well reasoned judgment - Therefore been decided with approval of Finance Minister that there seems to be no reason to suggest any change in decision of Special Court – Appeal dismissed

Judgment :-

Chelameswar, J.

1. These statutory appeals are filed under Section 10 of the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act 27 of 1992 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Special Court Act’). An appeal both on questions of fact and law under the above-mentioned provision is provided directly to this Court from any “judgment, decree, sentence or order” of a Special Court established under Section 5 of the above-mentioned Act.

2. The Special Court Act was made in the aftermath of a scandal in the stock market in the year 1991-1992 when “large scale irregularities and malpractices were noticed in both the Government and other securities, indulged in by some brokers in collusion with the employees of various banks and financial institutions”.[In the course of the investigations by the Reserve Bank of India, large scale irregularities and malpractices were noticed in transactions in both the Government and other securities, indulged in by some brokers in collusion with the employees of various bonds and financial institutions. The said irregularities and malpractices led to the diversion of funds from banks and financial institutions to the individual accounts of certain brokers.

2. To deal with the situation and in particular to ensure the speedy recovery of the huge amount involved, to punish the guilty and restore confidence in and maintain the basic integrity and credibility of the banks and financial institutions the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Ordinance, 1992 was promulgated on the 6th June, 1992. The Ordinance provides for the establishment of a Special Court with a sitting Judge of a High Court for speedy trial of offences relating to transactions in securities and disposal of properties attached. It also provides for appointment of one or more Custodians for attaching the property of the offenders with a view to prevent diversion of such properties by the offenders.]

3. Under Section 3(2) [Section 3. Appointment and functions of Custodian. –

(1) The Central Government may appoint one or more Custodians as it may deem fit for the purposes of this Act.

(2) The Custodian may, on being satisfied on information received that any person has been involved in any offence relating to transactions in securities after the 1st day of April, 1991 and on and before the 6th June, 1992 notify the name of such person in the Official Gazette.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Code and any other law for the time being in force, on and from the date of notification under sub-section (2), any property, movable or immovable, or both belonging to any person notified under that sub-section shall stand attached simultaneously with the issue of the notification.] of the said Act, the Custodian appointed by the Government of India, if satisfied that any person was involved in “any offence relating to transactions in securities” during the period falling between 01.04.1991 to 06.06.1992 is empowered to notify the name of such person in the official gazette. Upon such notification, all the properties whether movable or immovable belonging to any person so notified stand attached. The custodian is required to deal with such attached properties in such manner as the Special Court may direct. The Act further authorises the Government of India to establish a Special Court to be presided over by a sitting Judge of a High Court to be nominated by the Chief Justice of the High Court within the local limits of whose jurisdiction the Special Court is to be located. The concurrence of the Chief Justice of India is required to be obtained for such nomination of a sitting Judge of the High Court.

4. The Special Court is invested with jurisdiction both criminal and civil to deal with the offences committed by the notified persons and also with the properties and transactions in securities in which a notified person is involved and any matter or claim arising therefrom. An appeal








































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top