B.S.CHAUHAN, S.A.BOBDE
Gangabhavani – Appellant
Versus
Rayapati Venkat Reddy – Respondent
Judgment
Dr. B.S. CHAUHAN, J.
1. Both these appeals have been preferred against the impugned judgment and order of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad dated 13.2.2007 passed in Criminal Appeal No. 41 of 2005, reversing the judgment and order dated 22.12.2004 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kadapa at Proddatur in Sessions Case No. 374 of 2000, by which and whereunder the respondents were found guilty and convicted under Section 148 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as 'the IPC') and awarded a sentence of 2 years each.
A1 and A2 had been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and they were awarded life imprisonment with a fine of Rs.500/- and in default, to undergo further simple imprisonment for one month. They were also convicted under the provisions of Section 3 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act 1908') and had been awarded the sentence of 3 years with a fine of Rs.500/- and Rs.200/- respectively and, in default, to further undergo simple imprisonment for one month and 15 days respectively. They had further been convicted under Section 5 of the Act 1908, and were awarded the punishment of th
Ram Narain Singh v. State of Punjab
Tehsildar Singh v. State of U.P.
Pudhu Raja v. State, Rep. by Inspector of Police
Lal Bahadur v. State (NCT of Delhi)
Bhagalool Lodh v. State of U.P.
State of Rajasthan v. Smt. Kalki
Chakali Maddilety v. State of A. P.
Sachchey Lal Tiwari v. State of U.P.
P. Venkataswarlu v. State of A.P.
Laxmibai (Dead) Thr. L.Rs. v. Bhagwanthuva (Dead) Thr. L.Rs.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.