SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 805

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
H.L. DATTU AND M.Y. EQBAL, JJ.
AKASH TR.FATHER & LEGAL GUARDIAN – Appellant
VERSUS
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. – Respondent
Civil Appeal No. 7324 of 2013 (@ Special Leave Petition(c) No.29736 of 2011)
Decided on : 30-8-2013.

The main legal principle established is that compensation in motor vehicle accident cases should be adequate to address the loss suffered by the victim, and may need to be enhanced based on the specific circumstances of the case.

Headnote:

Compensation - Motor Vehicle Accident - Enhancement of Compensation

Fact of the Case:

The claimants sought compensation for a minor child who lost both legs in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal awarded Rs.4,07,000, which was increased to Rs.4,77,000 by the High Court. The appellant(s) appealed against this amount, seeking further enhancement.

Finding of the Court:

The court carefully reviewed the evidence and concluded that the compensation awarded by the High Court needed to be further enhanced to Rs.8 lacs with interest.

Issues: The main issue was the adequacy of the compensation awarded for the loss suffered by the minor child in the motor vehicle accident.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the compensation required further enhancement to adequately address the loss suffered by the minor child.

Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, modifying the judgment and order passed by the High Court by enhancing the compensation to Rs.8 lacs with interest.

ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in Miscellaneous Appeal No.2942/2008, dated 17.05.2010. By the impugned judgment and order, the High Court has enhanced the compensation awarded by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (for short 'the Tribunal') from Rs.4,07,000/-to Rs.4,77,000/-.

3. The claimants had approached the High Court for grant of compensation since the minor child had lost his both legs in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal, after considering the evidence on record, has come to the conclusion that the only compensation that would be payable to the child is a sum of Rs.4,07,000/-with interest.

4. Aggrieved by the award so passed by the Tribunal, the appellant(s) had approached the High Court. The High Court, after considering the entire evidence on record once over again, has thought it fit to increase the claim of the appellant(s) from Rs.4,07,000/-to Rs.4,77,000/-. Aggrieved by the meager compensation so awarded by the High Court, the appellant(s) is/are before us in this appeal.

5. We have carefully perused the judgment and order passed by the Tribunal and the High Court. In our opinion, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the compensation so awarded by the High Court requires to be modified and further requires to be enhanced from Rs.4,77,000/-with interest to Rs.8 lacs with interest.

6. Accordingly, we allow this appeal, modify the judgment and order passed by the High Court by enhancing the compensation from Rs.4,77,000/-to Rs.8 lacs with interest @ 6% p.a. from the date of the judgment and order passed by the High Court.

7. The order passed by us shall not be treated as a precedent in any other case.

Ordered accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top