SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 795

H.L.DATTU, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
ISWARYA ASSOCIATES – Appellant
Versus
BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE – Respondent


ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Writ Appeal No.387 of 2009, dated 25.02.2009 whereby the High Court has dismissed the Writ Appeal filed by the appellant herein.

3. By proceedings dated 26.12.2008, the Assistant Revenue Officer, the Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike ('the B.B.M.P.' for short), had granted temporary license/permission to the appellant herein for collection of the parking fee in a particular area. Subsequently, by its order dated 02.01.2009, the respondents have cancelled the license/ permission granted by the Assistant Revenue Officer. It is this action of the respondents which had prompted the appellant herein to approach the Writ Court in Writ Petition No.580 of 2009.

4. The learned Single Judge of the High Court, while entertaining the petition, had refused to grant the interim order sought for by the appellant. Aggrieved by the same, the appellant had filed Writ Appeal No.387 of 2009 before the Division Bench of the High Court. The High Court had called for the records of the writ petition since the consideration of the request made by the appellant for grant






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top