B.S.CHAUHAN, S.A.BOBDE
PUTCHALAPALLI NARESH REDDY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF A. P. & ETC. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S. A. BOBDE, J.
1. This batch of appeals is preferred by the accused against the common judgment and order dated 23rd March 2004 in Criminal Appeal Nos. 954 and 956 of 2008. Criminal Appeal Nos. 1521-1522 of 2011 are filed by the Accused No. 1; Criminal Appeal Nos. 1102-1103 of 2011 are filed by the accused Nos. 2-7; Criminal Appeal Nos. 1100-1101 of 2011 by the accused Nos. 8-12; Criminal Appeal Nos. 1093-1094 of 2011 are filed by the Accused No. 2, Konduru Nagure Reddy. Since they arise out of the same incident/judgment they have been taken up together for disposal.
2. The crime in question is the murder of Mudi Parandhami Reddy in an agricultural field on 25.11.96 in Mettu village in Andhra Pradesh. According to the prosecution, the deceased was a leader of the Congress party in the area. He was suspected by the Accused No. 1 Puchalapalli Parandhami Reddy, a leader of the Telugu Desam Party, as being responsible for the murder of his father on 25.3.92. Land disputes also existed between Rajagopal Reddy (L.W. 2), his brother Pelluru Murali Reddy (P.W. 3) on one side and A-19, Pelluru Venu Reddy about the division of survey No. 116. Litigation was pending between them in a
Murugesan vs. State, (2012) 10 SCC 383 (Paras 9
State of Punjab v. Karnail Singh
Sunil Kumar & Ors. V. State of M.P.
Maqsoodan & Ors. V. State of U.P.
Ramprasad v. State of Maharashtra
Gentela Vijayavardhan Rao & Anr. V. State of Andhra Pradesh
Ranjit Singh and Ors. V. State of Madhya Pradesh AIR 2011 SC 255. (Para 28)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.