SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 915

H.L.GOKHALE, J.CHELAMESWAR
GANESHLAL – Appellant
Versus
SHYAM – Respondent


ORDER

1. Heard Mr. Kishor Lambat, learned counsel in support of this appeal. None appears for the respondent though served.

2. The appellant herein had agreed to sell a plot of land to the respondent by virtue of an agreement entered into with him on 2nd August, 1999. Inasmuch as the appellant failed to hand over the possession of the concerned plot of land, the respondent filed a complaint, bearing No.62 of 2000, before the District Consumer Redressal Forum at Wardha. The appellant had raised the contention that the Consumer Forum had no jurisdiction to try the matter and a claim for specific performance of the agreement would lie only before the Civil Court and not before the District Consumer Redressal Forum. The District Forum, however, in its order dated 10.10.2000 took the view that no civil dispute was involved, and that it was a case of deficiency in rendering service to the respondent. The District Forum therefore passed an order directing the appellant to deliver the possession of the concerned plot of land.

3. The appellant carried this matter in appeal to the State Commission under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (the Act, for short). The State Commissio





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top