SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 362

G.S.SINGHVI, KURIAN JOSEPH, S.A.BOBDE
Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
Rajbir Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Gagan Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: S. Gowthaman, Advoate.

Judgment :

Leave granted.

2. Compensation which appears to it to be just, has to be assessed and awarded by the Claims Tribunal set up under Section 168 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short, 'the Act'), on an application under Section 166 of the Act.

3. In Nagappa vs. Gurudayal Singh and Others [AIR 2003 SC

674], it has been held by this Court that the main guiding principle for determining the compensation is that it must be just. It has also been held that the award must be reasonable. Some of the relevant parameters in that regard arise for consideration in this case.

4. Petitioners are the widow (Smt. Rajesh) and three minor children of late Bijender Singh-deceased victim. At the time of accident, the deceased was around 33 years. The fatal accident was on 05.10.2007. The deceased was working as clerk in a school under the education department in the State of Haryana. The salary certificate, Exhibit-P3, filed along with Claim Petition filed on 26.11.2007, showed that the deceased was drawing a monthly salary of Rs.6,926/-. The Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses, applied multiplier of 16 and further awarded an amount of Rs.10,000/-towards all other conventi



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top