SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 1039

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
G.S. SINGHVI, V. GOPALA GOWDA, JJ.
Brihanmumbai Mahanagarpalika and another – Appellants
versus
Willingdon Sports Club and others – Respondents
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5840 OF 2013 (Arising out of SLP(C) No. 7119 of 2010)
Decided On : 18-11-2013

IMPORTANT POINT
Gain is different from profit. Even in absence of profit gains derived from offering catering services would make a Club an eating house.

Headnote:(a) Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (now titled as 'the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888) - Section 394(1)(e) r/w Part IV of Schedule 'M' - A licensing system goes a long way in ensuring food safety thereby guaranteeing the supply of fresh and safe food and preventing the spread of food borne diseases (Para 14)

        (b) Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (now titled as 'the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888) - Section 394(1)(e) r/w Part IV of Schedule 'M' r/w Section 3(1)(n), Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006; Regulation 2.1 and 2.2, Food Safety and Standards (Licensing and Registration of Food Businesses) Regulations, 2011 - Eating House - 'Gain' - Club not offering catering services to members for profit, but deriving benefits from such service - It is 'gain' in terms of definition of 'eating house' - The respondent Club is Eating House and hence required to obtain a licence. (Para 21)

        (1875) LR 10 Ch App 545 - Relied upon

        (1969) MLJ 718; AIR 1979 (Bombay) 198 - Cited with approval

        WP No. 4675 of 1984 (Bombay) - Distinguished impliedly

       Facts of the case:

        whether respondent No.1, Willingdon Sports Club is obliged to take licence under Sectn 394(1)(e) read with Part IV of Schedule 'M' of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (now titled as 'the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888' - for short, 'the Act') for the catering services provided by it to the members and their guests.

       Finding of the Court:

        The benefit derived by the Club by offering catering services to its members makes it an eating house for the purpose of the Act. Licence is required.

       Result : Appeal allowed.

JUDGMENT

G.S. SINGHVI, J.

1. The question which arises for consideration in this appeal filed against order dated 29.9.2009 passed by the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition No.2199/1999 is whether respondent No.1 is obliged to take licence under Section 394(1)(e) read with Part IV of Schedule ‘M’ of the Bombay Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (now titled as ‘the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888’ – for short, ‘the Act’) for the catering services provided by it to the members and their guests.

2. Respondent No.1 provides various sporting facilities, viz., golf, tennis, squash, billiards, badminton, etc., to its members. The Catering Department of respondent No.1 provides catering services to the members and occasionally to their guests. By order dated 21.11.1990, appellant No.2 called upon respondent No.1 to make an application for grant of licence under Section 394 of the Act for the eating house. The latter submitted the application on 24.11.1990. Thereafter, Senior Sanitary Inspector of appellant No.1 sent communication dated 3.12.1990 to respondent No.2 requiring him to submit various documents including NOCs from Assistant Engineer (Buildings and Facilities) and Executive Engineer (Buildings Proposals). In compliance of that letter, respondent No.2 furnished some of the documents. However, nothing appears to have been done for the next two years.

3. In May 1993, respondent No.1 approached appellant No.2 for grant of No Objection Certificate for the eating house and permission to keep L.P. Gas Cylinders. Appellant No.2 gave ‘No Objection’ for carrying out the trade of eating house and for L.P. Gas as fuel subject to the following conditions:

“(1) The internal roads, passages in the premises & complex of the Club shall be maintained free from obstructions.

2) Entrances, exists, passages in both the Restaurants shall be maintained free from obstructions.

3) The existing four cabins housing gas cylinders of i) 12 Nos. each of 50 kgs. ii) 18 Nos. each 19.2 kgs. iii) 15 Nos. each. & iv) 8 Nos. each of 19.2 kgs. shall be of brick masonary R.C.C. and as per the plan signed in token of approval.

4) The gas installation shall be maintained as per "Industrial & Commercial use of L.P. Gas Rules" and got tested once in year by the gas dealer or any competent authority of inventory to that effect shall be maintained.

5) The Gas cabins shall be kept under lock and key.

6) Smoking, cooking, heating, use of naked light shall be prohibited near the gas cabins.

7) The gas pipes shall be supported, protected from physical damages, painted in red and taken at least 10 cms below the electric wirings/ cables.

8) Main shut of valves shall be provided to the gas pipes where pipes enter into the building for promptly closing the valves in case of emergency.

9) Tandoors in kitchen on ground floor permitted. However, any other fuel, any gas cylinders shall not be used.

10) Premises shall be kept well ventilated by providing Exhaust fans in the kitchens.

11) Metal hood covering the burners shall be provided. The ducting shall be taken to roof level or water wash system.

12) Fire extinguishers shall be kept as follows:

a) One dry chemical powder extinguisher each of 10 kgs. having I.S.I mark & two buckets of sand shall be kept at each of the 4 gas cabins. b) Two dry chemical powder extinguishers each of 10 kgs. & two sand buckets shall be kept in the kitchen of Indian Food. c) One dry chemical extinguisher of 10 kgs. shall be kept in Chinese kitchen.”

(reproduced from the appeal paper book)

4. After four months, appellant No.2 sent communication dated 4.11.1993 to respondent No.2 for compliance of the requirements communicated by Chief Fire Brigade Officer and also by his department. The relevant portions of that communication are extracted below:

“With reference to your above application, I have to inform you that your request will be considered subject to satisfactory compliance of the following requirements communicated by Chief Fire Brigad























































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top