SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, C.NAGAPPAN
Veer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
Judgment
C. NAGAPPAN, J.
1. These two appeals are preferred against the common judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Criminal Appeal No.749 of 1996 and Criminal Appeal No.761 of 1996 dated 1.10.2007.
2. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 749 of 1996 are accused Nos. 1 to 4 and the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.761 of 1996 is the accused No.5, in the Sessions Case No.72 of 1985, on the file of Third Additional Sessions Judge, Muzafarnagar, and they were tried along with three other accused for the alleged offences under Sections 147,148, 307 read with Section 302 read with Section 149 and Section 452 of Indian Penal Code.
Sessions Court found accused Nos. 6 to 8 not guilty of the charges and acquitted them and at the same time convicted accused Nos.1 to 5 for the charge under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC and sentenced them to death, subject to confirmation by the High Court; convicted them for the offences under Section 307 read with Section 149 of IPC and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years; convicted them for the offence under Section 452 IPC and sentenced them to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 4 year
Vadivelu Thevar and Anr. vs. State of Madras AIR 1957 SC 614
Kunju @ Balachandran vs. State of Tamil Nadu AIR 2008 SC 1381
Bipin Kumar Mondal vs. State of West Bengal AIR 2010 SC 3638
Mahesh and Another vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2011) 9 SCC 626
Prithipal Singh and ors. vs. State of Punjab and anr. (2012) 1 SCC 10
Kishan Chand vs. State of Haryana JT 2013 (1) SC 222 and Gulam
Sarbar vs. State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) – 2013 (12) SCALE 504)—Relied.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.