SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 25

K.S.P.RADHAKRISHNAN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited – Appellant
Versus
Securities and Exchange Board of India – Respondent


Judgment :

1. Delay condoned. We have carefully gone through the grounds raised in the review petitions filed by the appellants. We find none of the grounds mentioned in Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure read with Order 40 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1966 has been made out for review of our judgment. We also do not find any inconsistency in the views expressed by both of us. (Sahara India Real Estate Corpn. Ltd. V. SEBI, (2013) 1 SCC 1 : (2013) 1 SCC(Civ) 1 : (2013) 1 SCC (Cri) 257). On the other hand, all the contentions, legally and factually, raised by the appellants were examined, addressed and answered on all possible angles and dimensions.

2. Applications are stated to have been filed for placing new facts and documents on record for which the ingredients mentioned in Order 47 Rule (1)(c) have also not been satisfied. Even otherwise, all the records placed before us were meticulously examined and dealt with.

3. Review petitions are, therefore, not entertained and, accordingly, stand dismissed. As a sequel to this, applications seeking permission for open court listing, intervention and directions/stay also stand dismissed.

4. These review petitions have been file

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top