SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 1313

S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Tuncay Alankus – Respondent


Judgment :

These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 14.7.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CRLRP No.126/2005 whereby and whereunder the respondent's Revisional Application from an order of the learned Special Judge dated 11.10.2004 in regard to examination of defence witnesses had been allowed in part.

The respondent herein was charged for commission of offences punishable under Section 120B read with 409 IPC,420 IPC and 13(2) read with 7,11 and 13(1) (c) & (d) of PC Act, 1988 and Section 409, 420 IPC Section 7,11 and 13(1)(C)& (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

Examination of the prosecution witnesses before the Special Judge, admittedly, is over. The respondent has also been examined under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. He produced a list of 63 defence witnesses. The learned Special Judge examined at some length as to whether the deposition of the said witnesses would be necessary and by reason of an order dated 11.10.2004 opined that six out of 63 witnesses cited on behalf of the defence should be allowed to be examined.

Some of these witnesses were directed to be examined through Video Conferencing. It












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top