S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Central Bureau of Investigation – Appellant
Versus
Tuncay Alankus – Respondent
Judgment :
These appeals are directed against the judgment and order dated 14.7.2005 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in CRLRP No.126/2005 whereby and whereunder the respondent's Revisional Application from an order of the learned Special Judge dated 11.10.2004 in regard to examination of defence witnesses had been allowed in part.
The respondent herein was charged for commission of offences punishable under Section 120B read with 409 IPC,420 IPC and 13(2) read with 7,11 and 13(1) (c) & (d) of PC Act, 1988 and Section 409, 420 IPC Section 7,11 and 13(1)(C)& (d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Examination of the prosecution witnesses before the Special Judge, admittedly, is over. The respondent has also been examined under Section 313 of the Cr.P.C. He produced a list of 63 defence witnesses. The learned Special Judge examined at some length as to whether the deposition of the said witnesses would be necessary and by reason of an order dated 11.10.2004 opined that six out of 63 witnesses cited on behalf of the defence should be allowed to be examined.
Some of these witnesses were directed to be examined through Video Conferencing. It
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.