SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(SC) 8

A.K.PATNAIK, H.L.GOKHALE
BHOPAL GAS PEEDITH MAHILA UDYOG SANGATHAN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Order

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties. In this Court’s judgment in Writ Petition (C) No. 50 of 1998, etc. dated 09-08-2012, some directions were given with regard to the disposal of toxic materials / waste lying in and around the factory of Union Carbide Corporation Ltd., Bhopal.

2. It has been brought to our notice by this interlocutory application that the Madhya Pradesh High Court has been monitoring the removal of the same toxic waste in WP No. 2802 of 2004 and against the orders passed by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, Special Leave Petition No. 9874 of 2012 has been filed in this Court and a Bench of this Court is now monitoring the removal of the aforementioned toxic materials / waste.

3. Obviously, the directions in the judgment dated 09-08-2012 may conflict with the orders that may be passed by the Bench hearing Special Leave Petition No. 9874 of 2012.

4. It will be open for the petitioner in Writ Petition (C) No. 50 of 1998 to intervene in the aforesaid Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 9874 of 2012.

5. IA No. 17 stands allowed accordingly.

6. Reply be filed on behalf of the petitioners in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 50 of 1998 within two weeks from tod


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top