SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(SC) 739

D.K.JAIN, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
PRASHANT BHARTI – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent


Order

1. As per the office report, bailable warrants in the sum of Rs 5000 issued to Ms Priya Porwal vide order dated 12-5-2010, could not be served as she was not found residing at the address mentioned in the said order. It is also reported that un-served covers containing the bailable warrants sent to:

(i) the Commissioner of Police, ITO, New Delhi;

(ii) SHO, PS Tughlaqabad, Delhi; and

(iii) SHO, Police Station Madangir, New Delhi, have been received back with the remarks by the courier agency Short Address, No such Police Station and Police Station Shifted.

2. Without commenting on the unsatisfactory service report submitted by the courier service as the practice of service of notice through a courier has since been discontinued, we direct that fresh bailable warrants in the sum of Rs 10,000 shall be issued against the a forenamed lady, returnable on 6-11-2012. The warrants shall be given dasti to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner for being delivered in the Office of the Commissioner of Police, Delhi, Police Headquarters, IP Extension, New Delhi. The Commissioner of Police shall ensure that the warrants are executed with promptitude and the lady concerned is trace

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top