T.S.THAKUR, C.NAGAPPAN
Siemens Aktiengeselischaft & S. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
DMRC Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT : -
T.S. THAKUR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. A Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi has by a common order passed in Writ Petition (C) No.1853 of 2013 filed by the appellant and Writ Petition No.2615 of 2013 filed by Alstom Transport India Ltd. declined to interfere with the award of a contract for the supply of 486 Standard Gauge Cars Electrical Multiple Units meant for use in Phase-III of the Mass Rapid Transit System (‘MRTS’ for short) for Delhi and its extension corridors. The High Court has taken the view that the process of evaluation of the bids received from eligible bidders culminating in the award of a contract in favour of respondent No.2-Hyundai Rotem Company (‘HR’ for short) was transparent and did not suffer from any illegality, irregularity or perversity of any kind to warrant interference by it. The High Court held that the bidders were well aware of and had accepted the tender conditions which were free from any vagueness or uncertainty. The parameters of evaluation conditions were also held to have been applied uniformly to all the bidders under a procedure th
Amrik Singh Lyallpuri v. Union of India
Union of India v. K.M. Shankarappa
Jang Bahadur Singh v. Baij Nath Tiwari
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Asia Foundation & Construction Ltd. V. Trafalgar House Construction
Monarch Infrastructure (P) Ltd. v. Ulhasnagar Municipal Corpn.
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Heinz India (P) Ltd. v. State of U.P.
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.