DEEPAK VERMA, K.S.P.RADHAKRISHNAN
S. GANESHARAJU (DEAD) THROUGH – Appellant
Versus
NARASAMMA (DEAD) THROUGH – Respondent
ORDER
1. Delay in filing and refiling special leave petitions is condoned.
SLP(C) No. 26538 of 2009:
Leave granted.
2. The Appellants were Defendants along with other Respondents before XXII Additional City Civil Judge, Bangalore City in O.S. No. 3684 of 1992 decided on 13.7.2005. The said suit was filed by S. Chandra Raju and Ors. claiming partition with regard to suit property. The suit was dismissed by the Trial Court. Against it, Plaintiffs preferred R.F.A. No. 1476 of 2005 in the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, which came to be disposed of by learned Single Judge on 15.7.2008. The relevant operative part of the said order is reproduced hereinbelow:
10. Liberty is reserved to the Plaintiffs representing the branch of S. Munuswamyraju to approach the Bangalore Development Authority for reconveyance of site No. 777 and Defendants 1(a) to (g) in respect of site No. 777A. As per the request of S. Narasaraju the then CITB re-conveyed the site No. 290A in favour of his daughter the 4th Defendant herein. The Plaintiffs and other Defendants cannot have any right in respect of site No. 290A re-conveyed to 4th Defendant. So also, the Defendants cannot have any objections for the Plainti
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.