SEEMA LEPCHA vs STATE OF SIKKIM - 2012 Supreme(SC) 1

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2012 Supreme(SC) 1

G.S.SINGHVI, SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA
SEEMA LEPCHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF SIKKIM – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Colin Gonsalves, Senior Advocate (Dr Doma Bhutia and Ms Jyoti Mendiratta, Advocates) for the Petitioner;
Dhruv Mehta and A. Mariarputham, Senior Advocates (Ms Jayashree Wad, Ashish Wad, Ms Aruna Mahtur and Yusuf Khan, Advocates) for the Respondents.

ORDER

1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. The learned Senior Counsel appearing for the State of Sikkim is directed to instruct the officer concerned to file a comprehensive list of all public and private establishments operating within the State. The needful be done within a period of four weeks.

2. The Chief Secretary, State of Sikkim should file an affidavit and give details of the steps taken by the State Government for implementation of the guidelines framed by this Court in Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997) 6 SCC 241 as also order dated 26-4-2004 passed in Medha Kotwal Lele v. Union of India (2013) 1 SCC 311. The needful be done within a period of four weeks.

3. List in the first week of February, 2012.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document